Literature DB >> 8365966

Comparison of the secretory response of the nasal mucosa to methacholine and histamine.

F M Baroody1, M Wagenmann, R M Naclerio.   

Abstract

To better understand the secretory response of the nasal mucosa, we must be able to accurately measure its physiological response. To this end, we developed a localized challenge technique using paper disks to stimulate the mucosa on one side and measure secretions from both sides to study both direct and reflex responses. Both methacholine and histamine induced a dose-dependent increase in secretion weights on the challenge side, whereas only histamine induced a contralateral reflex. Repeated stimulation with histamine, but not methacholine, resulted in tachyphylaxis. Pretreatment with atropine resulted in inhibition of the contralateral secretory response to histamine and the ipsilateral response to methacholine with only partial inhibition of the ipsilateral histamine response. Terfenadine pretreatment resulted in the complete inhibition of both the ipsilateral and contralateral responses to histamine with no effect on methacholine-induced secretions. Ipsilaterally applied lidocaine had no effect on the histamine response but, when applied contralaterally, partially inhibited that response. Topical diphenhydramine applied ipsilaterally led to significant inhibition of the ipsilateral and contralateral secretory responses to histamine but had no effect when applied contralaterally. We conclude that methacholine and histamine have different effects on the nasal mucosa. We speculate that methacholine stimulates glands directly, whereas histamine includes both direct and neurogenic stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8365966     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1993.74.6.2661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  7 in total

Review 1.  Muscarinic receptor antagonists: effects on pulmonary function.

Authors:  Kalmia S Buels; Allison D Fryer
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2012

Review 2.  Nonallergic rhinitis. Pathophysiology and models for study.

Authors:  G Philip; A G Togias
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Unilateral nasal allergic reactions increase bilateral sinus eosinophil infiltration.

Authors:  Fuad M Baroody; Marcella Detineo; Robert M Naclerio
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2013-08-22

Review 4.  Further Understanding of Neuro-Immune Interactions in Allergy: Implications in Pathophysiology and Role in Disease Progression.

Authors:  Gerasimos N Konstantinou; Christopher Koulias; Konstantinos Petalas; Michael Makris; George N Konstantinou
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2022-09-10

5.  The release of IL-31 and IL-13 after nasal allergen challenge and their relation to nasal symptoms.

Authors:  Ralf Baumann; Matthaeus Rabaszowski; Igor Stenin; Maria Gaertner-Akerboom; Kathrin Scheckenbach; Jens Wiltfang; Joerg Schipper; Martin Wagenmann
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 5.871

6.  Nasal-ocular reflexes and their role in the management of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with intranasal steroids.

Authors:  Fuad M Baroody; Robert M Naclerio
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.084

Review 7.  Objective monitoring of nasal patency and nasal physiology in rhinitis.

Authors:  Robert A Nathan; Ron Eccles; Peter H Howarth; Sverre K Steinsvåg; Alkis Togias
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.793

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.