Literature DB >> 8365593

Sphincter of Oddi manometry: interobserver variability.

A Smithline1, R Hawes, G Lehman.   

Abstract

To determine the frequency and magnitude of interobserver variability, 50 sphincter of Oddi manometry tracings were read by three separate physicians experienced in reading such manometry. Ninety station pull-throughs were read, and attention was focused on the reference duodenal baseline pressure and two methods of reading the basal sphincter pressure. A high degree of correlation was found among the three observers with correlation coefficients of > 0.9 for reading baseline duodenal and basal sphincter pressures. Differences in basal sphincter pressure readings were greatest in patients with very high basal sphincter pressure. The most clinically relevant parameter was thought to be the mean basal sphincter pressure. All three observers agreed on normal (mean basal pressure < or = 40 mm Hg) versus abnormal (mean basal pressure > 40 mm Hg) in 82% to 90% of tracings. When the definition of agreement was broadened to include patients with pressures of 40 +/- 3 mm Hg (37 to 43 mm Hg), the observers agreed 87% to 94% of the time. Overall, these findings are thought to indicate that interobserver variability for reading sphincter of Oddi manometry is minimal when the observers are experienced in reading these tracings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8365593     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(93)70156-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  9 in total

Review 1.  Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: the tales of two countries.

Authors:  W J Hogan
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2000-04

Review 2.  Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: managing the patient with chronic biliary pain.

Authors:  Lana Bistritz; Vincent G Bain
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

Authors:  G A Lehman; S Sherman
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1996-08

Review 4.  Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction: Updates from the Recent Literature.

Authors:  Mohammad Yaghoobi; Joseph Romagnuolo
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-08

5.  Papillary dilation vs sphincterotomy in endoscopic removal of bile duct stones. A randomized trial with manometric function.

Authors:  A Minami; T Nakatsu; N Uchida; S Hirabayashi; H Fukuma; S A Morshed; M Nishioka
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Small bowel dysmotility in patients with postcholecystectomy sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

Authors:  P R Evans; Y T Bak; J F Dowsett; R C Smith; J E Kellow
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Normal sphincter of oddi motor function.

Authors:  Kinnari Kher; Moises Guelrud
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2004-04

Review 8.  Sphincter of Oddi Function and Risk Factors for Dysfunction.

Authors:  Elham Afghani; Simon K Lo; Paul S Covington; Brooks D Cash; Stephen J Pandol
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2017-01-30

9.  Wide disparities in attitudes and practices regarding Type II sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: a survey of expert U.S. endoscopists.

Authors:  Rabindra R Watson; Jason Klapman; Srinadh Komanduri; Janak N Shah; Sachin Wani; Raman Muthusamy
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-08-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.