Literature DB >> 8365295

Clinical and socioeconomic features of subjects with red cedar asthma. A follow-up study.

A Marabini1, H Dimich-Ward, S Y Kwan, S M Kennedy, N Waxler-Morrison, M Chan-Yeung.   

Abstract

A follow-up study of 128 subjects with red cedar asthma was conducted to evaluate the clinical and socioeconomic impact of the disease in determining the working status of the subjects after the diagnosis was made. The results suggest that the severity of asthma is not the main determinant of working status. Comparing the data at diagnosis and at follow-up examination, we found that the persistence of exposure resulted in a deterioration in the asthma despite the use of more medications. Subjects who were working were younger and had a larger number of dependents than the subjects who were not working at the time of the follow-up examination. We conclude that the socioeconomic factors are important in determining the working status of subjects with red cedar asthma. To prevent severe impairment and disability, there should be more economic incentives for these subjects to choose other jobs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8365295     DOI: 10.1378/chest.104.3.821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  10 in total

1.  Investigation of occupational asthma: Do clinicians fail to identify relevant occupational exposures?

Authors:  Carlo de Olim; Denis Bégin; Louis-Philippe Boulet; André Cartier; Michel Gérin; Catherine Lemière
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.409

Review 2.  The healthy worker effect in asthma: work may cause asthma, but asthma may also influence work.

Authors:  Nicole Le Moual; Francine Kauffmann; Ellen A Eisen; Susan M Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  New method for an occupational dust challenge test.

Authors:  F J Lin; H Chen; M Chan-Yeung
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 4.  Occupational asthma.

Authors:  Nicholas J Kenyon; Brian M Morrissey; Michael Schivo; Timothy E Albertson
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 5.  Outcome of occupational asthma after cessation of exposure: a systematic review.

Authors:  George Rachiotis; Rashna Savani; Andrew Brant; Stephanie J MacNeill; Anthony Newman Taylor; Paul Cullinan
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 6.  Evidence based guidelines for the prevention, identification, and management of occupational asthma.

Authors:  P J Nicholson; P Cullinan; A J Newman Taylor; P S Burge; C Boyle
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Direct costs of occupational asthma due to sensitization in Quebec (1988 to 2002): revisited.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Malo; Maria-Victoria Zunzunegui; Jocelyne L'Archevêque; Shélanie Cardinal; Heberto Ghezzo
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.409

Review 8.  Predictors of delayed return to work or job loss with respiratory ill-health: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jean Peters; Simon Pickvance; Jane Wilford; Ewan Macdonald; Lindsay Blank
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-02-13

Review 9.  Occupational asthma: a review.

Authors:  L J Lombardo; J R Balmes
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Sputum eosinophilia is a determinant of FEV1 decline in occupational asthma: results of an observational study.

Authors:  Donatella Talini; Federica Novelli; Elena Bacci; Marialaura Bartoli; Silvana Cianchetti; Francesco Costa; Federico L Dente; Antonella Di Franco; Manuela Latorre; Laura Malagrinò; Barbara Vagaggini; Alessandro Celi; Pierluigi Paggiaro
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.