Literature DB >> 8365180

Efficacy of skin barrier creams (II). Ineffectiveness of a popular "skin protector" against various irritants in the repetitive irritation test in the guinea pig.

P J Frosch1, A Schulze-Dirks, M Hoffmann, I Axthelm.   

Abstract

A popular "skin protector" consisting of an emulsion-like foam of lipophilic and hydrophilic substances (Marly skin) was evaluated in a previously described repetitive irritation guinea pig model. The product failed to inhibit the irritation due to sodium lauryl sulphate and toluene. In striking contrast to the recommended use, the irritant response of sodium hydroxide was aggravated, as demonstrated by significant differences for all test parameters (clinical score for erythema and scaling, transepidermal water loss, blood flow volume). The results show that protection against chemical irritants may be quite specific and that some formulations may actually be harmful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8365180     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1993.tb03486.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  6 in total

Review 1.  Are barrier creams actually effective?

Authors:  M S Alvarez; L H Brown; R R Brancaccio
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Effectiveness of skin protection creams as a preventive measure in occupational dermatitis: a critical update according to criteria of evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Birgitta Kütting; Hans Drexler
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-04-08       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 3.  Occupational skin-protection products--a review.

Authors:  J Kresken; A Klotz
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-05-21       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Comparison of transepidermal water loss rates in subjects with skin patch test positive vs negative to skin care products.

Authors:  Dan Liu; Si Wen; Li-Ning Huang; Xiaohua Wang; Can-Yi Gong; Zhiping Li; Hui Wang; Peter M Elias; Bin Yang; Mao-Qiang Man
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Effectiveness of skin protection creams in the prevention of occupational dermatitis: results of a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Robert Winker; Bayda Salameh; Sabine Stolkovich; Michael Nikl; Alfred Barth; Elisabeth Ponocny; Hans Drexler; Gerhard Tappeiner
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Skin protection creams in medical settings: successful or evil?

Authors:  Emmanuelle Xhauflaire-Uhoda; Elena Macarenko; Raphaël Denooz; Corinne Charlier; Gérald E Piérard
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 2.646

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.