Literature DB >> 8365079

A comparative evaluation of whey hydrolysate and whey-predominant formulas. How well do infants accept and tolerate them?

B Hauser1, K Keymolen, U Blecker, B Suys, A Bougatef, H Loeb, Y Vandenplas.   

Abstract

Whey hydrolysate formulas are a recent and important innovation in infant feeding. This study compared clinical tolerance and acceptability of a whey hydrolysate formula (WH) with those of a whey-predominant formula (WF) in 45 infants. Four infants (16%) who refused to drink WH formula were eliminated from the study. Mean volume intake was significantly lower for WH (120 mL/kg/day) than for WF (147 mL/kg/day; P < .001). Consequently, mean caloric intake was also significantly different: 80 kcal/kg/day (WF) vs 97 kcal/kg/day (WF; P < .001). Nevertheless, weight gain from birth to 13 weeks of age was nearly identical in both groups (171% for WH vs 178% for WF). No significant differences were noted in duration of feeding, number of pauses during feeding, number of stools per day, or number of regurgitations per day. The lower rate of caloric intake and the dropout rate of 16% for WH raise questions about the use of WH formula in normal infants, as has become the case in some Western European regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8365079     DOI: 10.1177/000992289303200708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)        ISSN: 0009-9228            Impact factor:   1.168


  10 in total

Review 1.  Diet, sensitive periods in flavour learning, and growth.

Authors:  Jillian C Trabulsi; Julie A Mennella
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2012-06

2.  Differential growth patterns among healthy infants fed protein hydrolysate or cow-milk formulas.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; Alison K Ventura; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  Strategies for prevention.

Authors:  Y Vandenplas
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 8.667

4.  Hypo-allergenic formulae: what's in a name?

Authors:  J P Buts; S Cadranel; A Deprettere; M Scaillon; E Sokal; M Van Caillie-Bertrand; Y Vandenplas; M Vanwinckel
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 5.  Infant formulas containing hydrolysed protein for prevention of allergic disease and food allergy.

Authors:  David A Osborn; John Kh Sinn; Lisa J Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-15

6.  Infant regulation of intake: the effect of free glutamate content in infant formulas.

Authors:  Alison K Ventura; Gary K Beauchamp; Julie A Mennella
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  The long-term effect of a partial whey hydrolysate formula on the prophylaxis of atopic disease.

Authors:  Y Vandenplas; B Hauser; C Van den Borre; C Clybouw; T Mahler; S Hachimi-Idrissi; L Deraeve; A Malfroot; I Dab
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  Association Between Added Sugars from Infant Formulas and Rapid Weight Gain in US Infants and Toddlers.

Authors:  Kai Ling Kong; Brenda Burgess; Katherine S Morris; Tyler Re; Holly R Hull; Debra K Sullivan; Rocco A Paluch
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.687

9.  Infant formulas containing hydrolysed protein for prevention of allergic disease.

Authors:  David A Osborn; John Kh Sinn; Lisa J Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-19

10.  Safety and tolerance of a new extensively hydrolyzed rice protein-based formula in the management of infants with cow's milk protein allergy.

Authors:  Yvan Vandenplas; Elisabeth De Greef; Bruno Hauser
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 3.183

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.