Literature DB >> 8364901

Tumor promotion in a breast cancer model by exposure to a weak alternating magnetic field.

W Löscher1, M Mevissen, W Lehmacher, A Stamm.   

Abstract

In view of the methodological problems of epidemiological studies on associations between exposures to 50/60 Hz magnetic fields (MF) and increased incidence of cancers, laboratory studies are necessary to determine if 50/60 Hz MF are cancer promoters or can progress cancers. The objective of the present study was to determine if an alternating MF of low flux density exerts tumor-promoting or co-promoting effects in a model of breast cancer in female rats. Mammary tumors were induced by the chemical carcinogen 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA). A group of 99 rats was exposed to a homogeneous MF of 50 Hz, 100 microT (microtesla), for 24 h/day 7 day/week for a period of 91 days; another group of 99 rats was sham-exposed under the same environmental conditions as the MF-exposed rats. The exposure chambers were identical for MF-exposed and sham-exposed animals. DMBA was administered orally at a dose of 5 mg/kg at the first day of exposure and at weekly intervals thereafter up to a total dose of 20 mg per rat. The animals were palpated once weekly to assess the development of mammary tumors. In controls, DMBA induced tumors in about 40% of the animals within three months of first application. Eight weeks after DMBA application the MF-exposed rats exhibited significantly more tumors than sham-exposed animals. This difference in the rate of tumor development was observed throughout the period of exposure. At the end of the three-month period of MF exposure the tumor incidence in MF-exposed rats was 50% higher than in sham-exposed rats, the difference being statistically significant. Furthermore, the size of tumors as estimated by palpation was significantly larger in the MF-exposed compared to sham-exposed rats. The data demonstrates that long-term exposure of DMBA-treated female rats to an alternating MF of low flux density promotes the growth and increases the incidence of mammary tumors, thus strongly indicating that MF exposure exerts tumor-promoting and/or copromoting effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8364901     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3835(93)90100-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Lett        ISSN: 0304-3835            Impact factor:   8.679


  11 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of carcinogenic effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF).

Authors:  Vahdettin Bayazit; Banu Bayram; Zeydin Pala; Ozkan Atan
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 2.  EMFs: cutting through the controversy.

Authors:  D Wartenberg
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 3.  [Environment and oncology].

Authors:  R Frentzel-Beyme
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 4.  Reported biological consequences related to the suppression of melatonin by electric and magnetic field exposure.

Authors:  R J Reiter
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  1995 Sep-Dec

5.  The frequencies of micronuclei induced by cisplatin in newborn rat astrocytes are increased by 50-Hz, 7.5- and 10-mT electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  Yuichi Miyakoshi; Hayato Yoshioka; Yoshimitsu Toyama; Yuji Suzuki; Hidesuke Shimizu
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.674

6.  The effect of magnetic resonance imaging on neural tube development in an early chicken embryo model.

Authors:  Emrah Kantarcioglu; Gokmen Kahilogullari; Murat Zaimoglu; Esin Ozlem Atmis; Elif Peker; Zeynep Yigman; Deniz Billur; Sevim Aydin; Ilhan Memet Erden; Agahan Unlü
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 7.  The melatonin hypothesis: electric power and breast cancer.

Authors:  R G Stevens; S Davis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Testing electromagnetic fields for potential carcinogenic activity: a critical review of animal models.

Authors:  J McCann; R Kavet; C N Rafferty
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Assessing the potential carcinogenic activity of magnetic fields using animal models.

Authors:  J McCann; R Kavet; C N Rafferty
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Effect of 13 week magnetic field exposures on DMBA-initiated mammary gland carcinomas in female Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  L E Anderson; G A Boorman; J E Morris; L B Sasser; P C Mann; S L Grumbein; J R Hailey; A McNally; R C Sills; J K Haseman
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.944

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.