Literature DB >> 8363638

2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) induced ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH3) activities in the brain and liver. A comparison between the most TCDD-susceptible and the most TCDD-resistant rat strain.

M Unkila1, R Pohjanvirta, P Honkakoski, R Törrönen, J Tuomisto.   

Abstract

2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is a potent inducer of ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase (EROD) and aldehyde dehydrogenase (EC 1.2.1.3., ALDH3) enzyme activities in the liver. Little is known about their inducibility by TCDD in the brain, although it may be a target organ for TCDD toxicity. Two strains of rat, Long-Evans (L-E) and Han/Wistar (H/W) exhibit an over 1000-fold difference in their LD50-values for TCDD. The induction of EROD and ALDH3 in discrete brain regions and in the liver of L-E and H/W rats were now compared at 10 days after TCDD exposure to assess the role of these responses in the strain difference. Liver EROD and ALDH3 were maximally induced at 5 micrograms/kg and 50 micrograms/kg, respectively, in both strains. In the brain 50 micrograms/kg TCDD was mostly needed to enhance EROD activity in both strains. The induction occurred especially in olfactory bulbs, but was also seen in the midbrain plus thalamus of both rat strains. The induced EROD activity in the olfactory bulb was almost totally abolished by a monoclonal antibody (Mab) 1-7-1 raised against CYP1A1. ALDH3 activities were increased more dose dependently in olfactory bulbs of H/W than L-E rats. In other brain areas measured, ALDH3 activities were induced more in L-E rats. Kinetic factors did not explain the differential induction of EROD and ALDH3 among discrete brain regions. We conclude that both EROD and ALDH3 are induced in the brain by TCDD although the activities are much lower than in the liver. The induction in the brain is region specific with olfactory bulbs being the most responsive area. As in the liver, the TCDD-induced activity of EROD in the brain is primarily associated with CYP1A1. According to the present findings, enzyme induction in the brain does not seem to have a crucial role in determining the strain susceptibility to the acute lethality of TCDD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8363638     DOI: 10.1016/0006-2952(93)90551-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol        ISSN: 0006-2952            Impact factor:   5.858


  4 in total

1.  Effect of cytochrome P450 1A induction on oxidative damage in rat brain.

Authors:  L Liu; R J Bridges; C L Eyer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.396

2.  Distribution and induction of cytochrome P450 1A1 in the rainbow trout brain.

Authors:  T Andersson; A Goksøyr
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.794

3.  Effects of Low-Dose Gestational TCDD Exposure on Behavior and on Hippocampal Neuron Morphology and Gene Expression in Mice.

Authors:  Talia E Gileadi; Abhyuday K Swamy; Zoe Hore; Stuart Horswell; Jacob Ellegood; Conor Mohan; Keiko Mizuno; Anne-Katrine Lundebye; K Peter Giese; Brigitta Stockinger; Christer Hogstrand; Jason P Lerch; Cathy Fernandes; M Albert Basson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Gene interaction network suggests dioxin induces a significant linkage between aryl hydrocarbon receptor and retinoic acid receptor beta.

Authors:  Hiroyoshi Toyoshiba; Takeharu Yamanaka; Hideko Sone; Frederick M Parham; Nigel J Walker; Jeanelle Martinez; Christopher J Portier
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.