| Literature DB >> 8363025 |
F Latorre1, M Hofmann, P P Kleemann, W F Dick.
Abstract
Nasotracheal intubation of the trachea by means of fiberoptic endoscopy is an accepted approach to difficult airways. The associated avoidance of direct laryngoscopy may affect the stress response to nasotracheal intubation. We tested this hypothesis by means of a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study. METHODS. Informed consent was obtained from 30 patients presenting for maxillofacial surgery for participation in this study. Patients were allocated to three groups: nasotracheal intubation to be performed either fiberendoscopically (group 1) or laryngoscopically, with (group 2) or without (group 3) topical anaesthesia of the larynx. Haemodynamic variables (arterial blood pressure and heart rate) and concentrations of catecholamines* in plasma (adrenaline, noradrenaline; HPLC) were documented at four (two*) time points, respectively: prior to induction of anaesthesia*, after induction, 1 min after tracheal intubation*, 5 min after tracheal intubation. Differences between time points and between groups were analysed with the chi-square test; a probability of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS. With respect to age, body-weight and gender, the groups were comparable. No major hemodynamic or endocrine stress responses were observed in any group. Diastolic blood pressures were significantly lower in groups one and two, one minute after tracheal intubation. DISCUSSION. Nasotracheal intubation does not provoke a major stress response, when performed in accordance with the protocol of this study. However, topical anaesthesia of the larynx, as well as the fiberendoscopic approach proved superior to control with respect to diastolic arterial pressure. We conclude that fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation, or laryngoscopy preceded by topical anaesthesia of the larynx may be useful in patients for whom an increase in rate pressure product would be undesirable.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1993 PMID: 8363025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anaesthesist ISSN: 0003-2417 Impact factor: 1.041