Literature DB >> 8362778

Predictive value of dobutamine echocardiography just before noncardiac vascular surgery.

J P Eichelberger1, K Q Schwarz, E R Black, R M Green, K Ouriel.   

Abstract

This study prospectively evaluated 75 consecutive patients (mean age 69 +/- 9 years) undergoing major vascular surgery to test the hypothesis that dobutamine stress echocardiography can be used to predict perioperative cardiac events. A positive test was defined as a new or worsening wall motion abnormality in at least 2 of 18 wall segments. Up to 40 micrograms/kg/min of dobutamine was administered. All readings were done by physicians unaware of the patients' symptoms and electrocardiographic response. In addition, physicians caring for the patients were unaware of the test result. End points of the study were unstable angina with documented electrocardiographic changes, nonfatal myocardial infarction or cardiac death. The perioperative ischemic event rate was 7% (5 of 75 patients). Three patients developed unstable angina and 2 sustained nonfatal myocardial infarctions. All of these patients had positive results on dobutamine stress echocardiography (sensitivity 100%). However, 22 patients who also had positive results on dobutamine stress echocardiography did not have perioperative events (specificity 69%). The corresponding positive predictive value was 19%. None of the 48 patients who had negative results on dobutamine stress echocardiography had events (negative predictive value 100%). In conclusion, dobutamine stress echocardiography can be used to predict perioperative events with great sensitivity, but its positive predictive value in this patient population in low, likely due to the low incidence of perioperative events in patients with known coronary artery disease and the imperfect specificity of dobutamine stress echocardiography in identifying significant coronary stenosis. Dobutamine stress echocardiography is most useful in this setting when negative, because it predicts safety from complications with confidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8362778     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90359-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

1.  Extensive preoperative testing is not necessary in morbidly obese patients undergoing gastric bypass.

Authors:  Archana Ramaswamy; Rodrigo Gonzalez; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Preoperative cardiac testing before major vascular surgery.

Authors:  Sanne E Hoeks; Olaf Schouten; Maureen J van der Vlugt; Don Poldermans
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Preoperative evaluation of patients with possible coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Willem-Jan Flu; Jan-Peter van Kuijk; Sanne Hoeks; Jeroen J Bax; Don Poldermans
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  A meta-analysis comparing the prognostic accuracy of six diagnostic tests for predicting perioperative cardiac risk in patients undergoing major vascular surgery.

Authors:  M D Kertai; E Boersma; J J Bax; M H Heijenbrok-Kal; M G M Hunink; G J L'talien; J R T C Roelandt; H van Urk; D Poldermans
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  [Premedication visits. Economizing at the cost of the patient?].

Authors:  C D Kratz; M Christ; B Maisch; K M Kerwat; C Olt; A Zielke; A Hellinger; H Wulf; G Geldner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  The clinical use of stress echocardiography in ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Rosa Sicari; Lauro Cortigiani
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.062

7.  Practical guidance for the implementation of stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Kengo Suzuki; Yutaka Hirano; Hirotsugu Yamada; Mitsushige Murata; Masao Daimon; Masaaki Takeuchi; Yoshihiro Seo; Chisato Izumi; Makoto Akaishi
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2018-06-06

Review 8.  Perioperative risk stratification in non cardiac surgery: role of pharmacological stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Rosa Sicari
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 2.062

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.