Literature DB >> 8362535

Management of bile duct injuries and strictures following cholecystectomy.

M Raute1, P Podlech, W Jaschke, B C Manegold, M Trede, B Chir.   

Abstract

During 7057 conventional cholecystectomies (1972-1991), 16 bile duct injuries occurred, amounting to a risk of 0.22%. A total of 1022 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed without such a complication since April 1990. In a retrospective study, 64 patients (16 of our patients and 48 referrals) with an injury or stricture due to conventional cholecystectomy were investigated. In 14 of our 16 patients the injury was recognized and immediately repaired with a good long-term result of 93%, including one successful repair of a subsequent stricture. Two cases of unrecognized injury were managed by nonoperative means. The group of 48 referred patients comprised 10 early postoperative complications (21%) and 38 strictures after an "uneventful" cholecystectomy. Of the 64 total patients, 10 (16%) underwent nonoperative treatment, and 54 required surgery. The mean follow-up period after surgery was 7.4 +/- 4.9 years. Most cases (93%) were repaired by bilioenteric anastomosis (i.e., foremost hepaticojejunostomy) with an 18% restricture rate. Including second and third repairs for restricture, a total of 60 operations (14 primary and 46 secondary reconstructions) were performed without hospital mortality. A good long-term result after stricture repair was achieved in 75% of the patients, whereas 17% had a poor outcome owing to restricture or death (10% had related mortality within 10 years). The other 8% had a moderate result due to recurrent cholangitis. Thus immediate repair of a bile duct injury offers the better chance of a favorable prognosis compared to secondary stricture repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8362535     DOI: 10.1007/bf01655124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  28 in total

1.  High or low hepaticojejunostomy for bile duct strictures?

Authors:  J Terblanche; C S Worthley; R A Spence; J E Krige
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Laparoscopic injuries to the bile duct. A cause for concern.

Authors:  A R Moossa; D W Easter; E Van Sonnenberg; G Casola; H D'Agostino
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Treatment of iatrogenic common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy through the laparoscopic insertion of a T-tube stent.

Authors:  G Lepsien; F E Lüdtke; T Neufang; A Schafmayer; H J Peiper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Prevention and repair of strictures of the extrahepatic bile ducts.

Authors:  K W Warren; M F Jefferson
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Late results of immediate primary end to end repair in accidental section of the common bile duct.

Authors:  A Csendes; J C Díaz; P Burdiles; F Maluenda
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1989-02

6.  Permanent-access hepaticojejunostomy.

Authors:  E M Barker; M Winkler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Recurrent biliary stricture. Patterns of recurrence and outcome of surgical therapy.

Authors:  C A Pellegrini; M J Thomas; L W Way
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Unilateral hepatic duct obstruction.

Authors:  S G ReMine; J W Braasch; R L Rossi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Early management of operative injuries of the extrahepatic biliary tract.

Authors:  I W Browder; J B Dowling; K K Koontz; M S Litwin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Lesions of the segmental and lobar hepatic ducts.

Authors:  W P Longmire; R K Tompkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment.

Authors:  A Shamiyeh; W Wayand
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  [Inspection jejunostomy after complex reconstruction of the central bile duct. Indication, description, and personal experience].

Authors:  C Knorr; W Hohenberger; K E Matzel; S Kastl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  [Relaparoscopy as an alternative to laparotomy for laparoscopic complications].

Authors:  I Leister; H Becker
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Iatrogenic bile duct injuries in kashmir valley.

Authors:  Nisar A Chowdri; Farooq A Dar; Zahoor A Naikoo; Nazir A Wani; Fazl Q Parray; Khurshid A Wani
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 0.656

5.  [Injuries of the extrahepatic bile ducts. Clinical aspects, diagnosis and therapy].

Authors:  U Sulkowski; J Brockmann; P Dinse
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1996

Review 6.  The current diagnosis and treatment of benign biliary stricture.

Authors:  Hiroshi Shimada; Itaru Endo; Kazuhiro Shimada; Ryusei Matsuyama; Noritoshi Kobayashi; Kensuke Kubota
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Management of post-cholecystectomy benign bile duct strictures: review.

Authors:  Sadiq S Sikora
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 0.656

8.  Bile duct injuries: management of late complications.

Authors:  E de Santibañes; M Palavecino; V Ardiles; J Pekolj
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Complex bile duct injuries: management.

Authors:  E de Santibáñes; V Ardiles; J Pekolj
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Management of major bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  L Kaman; A Behera; R Singh; R N Katariya
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.