Literature DB >> 8362532

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a minor abdominal trauma?

E Schippers1, A P Ottinger, M Anurov, M Polivoda, V Schumpelick.   

Abstract

Clinical observations following laparoscopic surgery indicate a shorter period of postoperative ileus than after conventional surgery. The aim of our study was to verify disorders of postoperative motility of the small intestine by means of implanted electrodes after laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy (CHE) in an animal model. Four weeks after implantation of three electrodes on the jejunum, CHE was performed laparoscopically in 5 dogs and in an additional 5 dogs by laparotomy. Independent of the type of operation, normal motility (especially the migrating motility complex) was abolished during the early postoperative period. Electrical activity was characterized by the basic electrical rhythm. Time to the occurrence of the first postoperative activity front, indicating restoration of motility, varied significantly depending on the type of operation: It was 5.5 +/- 1.0 hours after laparoscopic CHE and 46 +/- 5 hours after conventional CHE. These results support the hypothesis that small peritoneal incisions and less manipulation of the intestine during laparoscopic surgery result in reduced abdominal trauma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8362532     DOI: 10.1007/bf01655118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  22 in total

1.  SURGERY AND INTESTINAL MOTILITY.

Authors:  L F TINCKLER
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1965-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Modified laparoscopic appendectomy in surgery. A report on 388 operations.

Authors:  F Götz; A Pier; C Bacher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Postoperative ileus: a colonic problem?

Authors:  J H Woods; L W Erickson; R E Condon; W J Schulte; L F Sillin
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  [The "ideal" cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study].

Authors:  W Schaupp; H W Menges; H D Schworm
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  A migrating electric complex of canine small intestine.

Authors:  J H Szurszewski
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1969-12

6.  Pathophysiology of postoperative ileus.

Authors:  J Smith; K A Kelly; R M Weinshilboum
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1977-02

7.  Changes in small bowel myoelectrical activity following laparotomy.

Authors:  I R Morris; C F Darby; P Hammond; I Taylor
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Gastrointestinal myoelectric activity following abdominal operations in the opossum.

Authors:  J C Coelho; D J Gouma; F G Moody; Y F Li
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Electromyographic activity of the gastrointestinal tract following cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J C Coelho; C A Pupo; A C Campos; A A Moss Júnior
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Surgonomics: the cost of cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E Muñoz; M A Tinker; I Margolis; L Wise
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  10 in total

1.  Shorter postoperative atony after laparoscopic-assisted colonic resection? An animal study.

Authors:  A Tittel; E Schippers; M Anurov; S Titkova; A Ottinger; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: is it superior to open surgery?

Authors:  S Shimizu; A Uchiyama; K Mizumoto; T Morisaki; K Nakamura; H Shimura; M Tanaka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Surgical manipulation of the gut elicits an intestinal muscularis inflammatory response resulting in postsurgical ileus.

Authors:  J C Kalff; W H Schraut; R L Simmons; A J Bauer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Recovery of fasted and fed gastrointestinal motility after open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in dogs.

Authors:  M Hotokezaka; M J Combs; E P Mentis; B D Schirmer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Recovery of gastrointestinal motility following open versus laparoscopic colon resection in dogs.

Authors:  M Hotokezaka; M J Combs; B D Schirmer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Operative stress response is reduced after laparoscopic compared to open cholecystectomy: the relationship with postoperative pain and ileus.

Authors:  I Le Blanc-Louvry; A Coquerel; E Koning; C Maillot; P Ducrotté
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy nearly abolishes the postoperative hepatic catabolic stress response.

Authors:  H Glerup; H Heindorff; A Flyvbjerg; S L Jensen; H Vilstrup
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Gasless laparoscopy-assisted subtotal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a novel minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Tzung-Hsin Chou; Ming-Hsun Wu; Ming-Yang Wang; Ching-Yao Yang; Peng-Sheng Lai; Ming-Tsan Lin; Po-Huang Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Intraabdominal humidity and electromyographic activity of the gastrointestinal tract. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy.

Authors:  A Tittel; E Schippers; V Grablowitz; M Pollivoda; M Anurov; A Ottinger; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Comparison of multi-modal early oral nutrition for the tolerance of oral nutrition with conventional care after major abdominal surgery: a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial.

Authors:  Da-Li Sun; Wei-Ming Li; Shu-Min Li; Yun-Yun Cen; Qing-Wen Xu; Yi-Jun Li; Yan-Bo Sun; Yu-Xing Qi; Yue-Ying Lin; Ting Yang; Qi-Ping Lu; Peng-Yuan Xu
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.271

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.