Literature DB >> 8361862

Differences in serum concentrations of and responses to generic verapamil in the elderly.

B L Carter1, M A Noyes, R W Demmler.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine if there are greater differences in bioavailability of generic verapamil at steady state in elderly patients than in healthy young subjects.
DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, three-way crossover study.
SETTING: Clinical research center at a general teaching hospital.
SUBJECTS: Eight young, healthy subjects between ages 18 and 45 years, and eight elderly, hypertensive patients over 65 years of age.
INTERVENTIONS: Each participant was randomly assigned to receive brand-name verapamil or one of two generic preparations. Young subjects received each of the three preparations 80 mg twice/day for 7 days separated by a 1-week washout. Elderly patients took the three preparations for 21 days. Serum drug levels and blood pressure were measured and electrocardiograms performed 13 times after the last dose of drug. MAIN
RESULTS: In young subjects, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the three preparations were nearly identical. There was, however, a great deal of variability in the bioavailability of the generic products. In the elderly patients, one generic product had a maximum serum concentration and area under the curve that were 77% and 43% greater, respectively, than the brand-name product (p < 0.02). Assessments of bioequivalency (based on confidence intervals) demonstrated that this generic drug's bioavailability was from 4-118% and peak serum concentration from 10-139% greater than the brand-name drug. This was associated with greater prolongation of the PR intervals.
CONCLUSIONS: A generic verapamil product that is bioequivalent in young subjects may not be bioequivalent in elderly subjects. Testing of drugs with complex pharmacokinetics in young subjects may not reliably predict the clinical outcomes in elderly hypertensive patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8361862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  7 in total

1.  Subject-by-formulation interaction in bioequivalence: conceptual and statistical issues. FDA Population/Individual Bioequivalence Working Group. Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  W W Hauck; T Hyslop; M L Chen; R Patnaik; R L Williams
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Individual bioequivalence revisited.

Authors:  M L Chen; L J Lesko
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Generic and therapeutic substitution: a viewpoint on achieving best practice in Europe.

Authors:  Atholl Johnston; Roland Asmar; Björn Dahlöf; Kate Hill; David Albert Jones; Jens Jordan; Michael Livingston; Graham Macgregor; Michael Sobanja; Panagiotis Stafylas; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; José Zamorano
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Generic drugs. Therapeutic equivalence.

Authors:  P A Meredith
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Clinical equivalence of generic and brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Alexander S Misono; Joy L Lee; Margaret R Stedman; M Alan Brookhart; Niteesh K Choudhry; William H Shrank
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Fixed-dosed combinations are not indicated as initial therapy: a debate.

Authors:  Barry L Carter
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 7.  Generic versus brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Lamberto Manzoli; Maria Elena Flacco; Stefania Boccia; Elvira D'Andrea; Nikola Panic; Carolina Marzuillo; Roberta Siliquini; Walter Ricciardi; Paolo Villari; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 8.082

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.