Literature DB >> 8361832

Counterexample to the hypothesis of functional similarity between tactile and visual pattern perception.

J M Loomis1.   

Abstract

In earlier work, the author has demonstrated that tactile pattern perception and visual pattern perception exhibit many parallels when the effective spatial resolution of vision is reduced to that of touch, thus supporting the hypothesis that the two pattern senses are functionally similar when matched in spatial bandwidth. The present experiments demonstrate a clear counterexample to this hypothesis of functional similarity. Specifically, it was found that the lateral masking effect of a surround on tactile character recognition increases when the surround changes in composition from solid lines to dots, whereas for vision, recognition performance goes in the opposite direction. This finding necessitates some modification of the model of character recognition proposed by the author (Loomis, 1990) as it applies to the sensing of raised tactile patterns. One possible modification would be to incorporate, as the initial stage of pattern transformation, the continuum mechanics model for the skin that was developed by Phillips and Johnson (1981b).

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8361832     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  11 in total

1.  Representation of braille characters in human nerve fibres.

Authors:  J R Phillips; R S Johansson; K O Johnson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Human tactile pattern recognition: active versus passive touch, velocity effects, and patterns of confusion.

Authors:  F Vega-Bermudez; K O Johnson; S S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  A model of character recognition and legibility.

Authors:  J M Loomis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Tactile spatial resolution. II. Neural representation of Bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents.

Authors:  J R Phillips; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Analysis of tactile and visual confusion matrices.

Authors:  J M Loomis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-01

6.  Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition.

Authors:  K O Johnson; J R Phillips
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Tactile spatial resolution. III. A continuum mechanics model of skin predicting mechanoreceptor responses to bars, edges, and gratings.

Authors:  J R Phillips; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  On the tangibility of letters and braille.

Authors:  J M Loomis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-01

9.  A tactile metacontrast effect.

Authors:  J M Weisenberger; J C Craig
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-06

10.  Lateral masking in foveal and eccentric vision.

Authors:  J M Loomis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  4 in total

1.  Adaptive changes in early and late blind: a fMRI study of Braille reading.

Authors:  H Burton; A Z Snyder; T E Conturo; E Akbudak; J M Ollinger; M E Raichle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Visual cortex activity in early and late blind people.

Authors:  H Burton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Vibrotactile pattern discrimination and communality at several body sites.

Authors:  R W Cholewiak; A A Collins
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-07

4.  Vision is superior to touch in shape perception even with equivalent peripheral input.

Authors:  Yoonju Cho; J C Craig; S S Hsiao; S J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.