Literature DB >> 8360451

The struggle for the soul of health insurance.

D A Stone1.   

Abstract

The politics of American health insurance is a struggle over which vision of distributive justice should govern: the solidarity principle or the logic of actuarial fairness. Actuarial fairness is central to American private health insurance. It is both an antiredistributive ideology and a method of organizing mutual aid by fragmenting communities into ever-smaller, more homogeneous groups, leading ultimately to the destruction of mutual aid. This fragmentation is accomplished by fostering in people a sense of their differences and their responsibility for themselves, rather than their commonalities and interdependence. Actuarial fairness developed as a business strategy for gaining market share. Medical underwriting, which is far more extensive than commonly known, is the information technology used for implementing actuarial fairness. Despite significant changes in the political context of health insurance which are leading toward restraints on underwriting, the logic of actuarial fairness is so deeply embedded in the structure of competitive markets in insurance and so deeply consonant with social divisions in American society that eradicating it will take more than any current reform proposals contemplate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blue Cross-Blue Shield; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8360451     DOI: 10.1215/03616878-18-2-287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law        ISSN: 0361-6878            Impact factor:   2.265


  11 in total

1.  Why not private health insurance? 1. Insurance made easy.

Authors:  R Deber; A Gildiner; P Baranek
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-09-07       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Health services research as a source of legislative analysis and input: the role of the California Health Benefits Review Program.

Authors:  Thomas R Oliver; Rachel Friedman Singer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Genetic 'risk carriers' and lifestyle 'risk takers'. Which risks deserve our legal protection in insurance?

Authors:  Ine Van Hoyweghen; Klasien Horstman; Rita Schepers
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-02-21

4.  Risk equalization, competition, and choice: a preliminary assessment of the 1993 German health reforms.

Authors:  J A Wysong; T Abel
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1996

Review 5.  Views on the ethical struggle for universal, high quality, affordable health care and its relevance for gerontology.

Authors:  George M Martin
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.032

6.  Gold and silver health plans: accommodating demand heterogeneity in managed competition.

Authors:  Jacob Glazer; Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Paying for long-term care.

Authors:  C L Estes; T Bodenheimer
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1994-01

8.  Guidelines as rationing tools: a qualitative analysis of psychosocial patient selection criteria for cardiac procedures.

Authors:  M K Giacomini; D J Cook; D L Streiner; S S Anand
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-03-06       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Corporate Logic in Clinical Care: The Case of Diabetes Management.

Authors:  Linda M Hunt; Hannah S Bell; Anna C Martinez-Hume; Funmi Odumosu; Heather A Howard
Journal:  Med Anthropol Q       Date:  2019-11-19

Review 10.  Privacy in the age of medical big data.

Authors:  W Nicholson Price; I Glenn Cohen
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 87.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.