Literature DB >> 8360134

Randomized comparison of oral fluconazole versus oral polyenes for the prevention of fungal infection in patients at risk of neutropenia. Multicentre Study Group.

J N Philpott-Howard1, J J Wade, G J Mufti, K W Brammer, G Ehninger.   

Abstract

An open, randomized study was performed at 18 European centres to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerance of oral fluconazole with oral polyenes for the prophylaxis of fungal colonization and infection in adults at high risk of developing neutropenia. Five hundred and thirty-six hospitalized patients with malignant disease, about to receive chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or bone marrow transplantation, and who were already neutropenic or were expected to develop neutropenia were included in the study. Before therapy or transplantation, patients commenced either oral fluconazole therapy (50 mg/day as a single dose) or oral polyenes therapy (amphotericin B 2 g/day and/or nystatin 4 x 10(6) units/day in four or more divided doses), for a mean of 29.3 days and 31.3 days, respectively. After baseline clinical and mycological testing, patients were re-evaluated at least weekly during prophylaxis, at the end of prophylaxis and two to six weeks later to identify proven or suspected fungal infection and to determine rates of colonization with fungi. Fungal infection was diagnosed in 41 of 511 evaluable patients, 10 (3.9%) of 256 in the fluconazole group and 31 (12.2%) of 255 in the polyene group (P = 0.001). This total included four patients (1.6%) in the fluconazole group who developed oropharyngeal candidiasis compared with 22 (8.6%) in the polyene group (P < 0.001). Systemic infections comprised 6 (2.3%) in the fluconazole group and 9 (3.5%) in the polyene group (P = not significant), and included three Candida krusei infections in each group. Parenteral amphotericin B therapy was given empirically for persistent fevers in an additional 62 (24.2%) patients receiving fluconazole and 59 (23.1%) receiving polyenes (P = not significant). Colonization with fungi was generally similar in each treatment group, although an increased proportion of patients receiving fluconazole developed colonization of the faeces (P < 0.01). Adverse reactions, possibly related to treatment, were recorded in 15 (5.6%) of 269 patients in the fluconazole group and 14 (5.2%) of 267 in the polyene group; these necessitated discontinuation of therapy in seven patients in each group. Once-a-day fluconazole was therefore more effective than oral polyenes for the prevention of oropharyngeal fungal infection and as effective for the prevention of infections at other sites in patients with neutropenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8360134     DOI: 10.1093/jac/31.6.973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  21 in total

Review 1.  Antifungal prophylaxis during neutropenia and immunodeficiency.

Authors:  O Lortholary; B Dupont
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Response to van Saene et al.'s comment on "Prevention of severe Candida infections in non-neutropenic, high-risk, critically ill patients".

Authors:  Thierry Calandra; Oscar Marchetti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  A systematic review of oral fungal infections in patients receiving cancer therapy.

Authors:  Rajesh V Lalla; Marie C Latortue; Catherine H Hong; Anura Ariyawardana; Sandra D'Amato-Palumbo; Dena J Fischer; Andrew Martof; Ourania Nicolatou-Galitis; Lauren L Patton; Linda S Elting; Fred K L Spijkervet; Michael T Brennan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment.

Authors:  J E Clarkson; H V Worthington; O B Eden
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

5.  Primary prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in patients with hematologic malignancies. Recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society for Haematology and Oncology.

Authors:  Oliver A Cornely; Angelika Böhme; Dieter Buchheidt; Hermann Einsele; Werner J Heinz; Meinolf Karthaus; Stefan W Krause; William Krüger; Georg Maschmeyer; Olaf Penack; Jörg Ritter; Markus Ruhnke; Michael Sandherr; Michal Sieniawski; Jörg-Janne Vehreschild; Hans-Heinrich Wolf; Andrew J Ullmann
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 6.  Amphotericin B versus fluconazole for controlling fungal infections in neutropenic cancer patients.

Authors:  Helle Krogh Johansen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-09-04

Review 7.  Fungal infections in patients with neutropenia: challenges in prophylaxis and treatment.

Authors:  R Herbrecht; S Neuville; V Letscher-Bru; S Natarajan-Amé; O Lortholary
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 8.  Practical modalities for prevention of fungal infections in cancer patients.

Authors:  B E De Pauw
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Susceptibilities of Candida spp. to antifungal agents visualized by two-dimensional scatterplots of relative growth.

Authors:  F C Odds; G Dams; G Just; P Lewi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Antifungal management in cancer patients.

Authors:  Philipp Staber; Stefan Langner; Hans Jürgen Dornbusch; Peter Neumeister
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.