Literature DB >> 8357024

Monitoring for new multiple congenital anomalies in the search for human teratogens.

M J Khoury1, L Botto, G D Waters, P Mastroiacovo, E Castilla, J D Erickson.   

Abstract

The ability of birth defects monitoring to detect new human teratogenic and mutagenic agents may be limited if only isolated defects are monitored. Surveillance for "new" multiple congenital anomalies (MCA) may improve the detection of environmental agents associated with new defect patterns. To evaluate the feasibility of such monitoring, we examined data from two programs: 1) the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP), which ascertains infants with serious defects diagnosed in the first year of life, and, 2) the Italian Multicenter Register for Congenital Malformations (IPIMC), which ascertains newborn infants with birth defects from many hospitals in Italy. We focused on 24 relatively serious defects and defect groups. For a baseline period (MACDP: 1968-1988, 581,000 births; IPIMC: 1986-1989, 448,000 births), we identified all possible combinations of defects occurring in the same baby. For a test period (MACDP: 1989-1990, 77,000 births; IPIMC: 1990, 91,500 births), we identified babies with "new" MCA (i.e., combinations of defects not observed before in the system). During this period in MACDP, of the 85 babies with two or more defects, 9 babies had new MCAs. In IPIMC, of the 54 babies with two or more defects, 10 babies had new MCAs. A review of the records of infants with new MCAs in MACDP and IPIMC did not identify commonalities in maternal characteristics. This analysis illustrates the feasibility of monitoring for new MCAs in surveillance systems. This approach, complemented by an evaluation of exposures, may be a powerful additional tool in searching for human teratogens and mutagens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8357024     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320460425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  6 in total

1.  Congenital malformations and maternal occupation: a registry based case-control study.

Authors:  F Bianchi; D Cianciulli; A Pierini; A Seniori Costantini
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Global Birth Prevalence of Spina Bifida by Folic Acid Fortification Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Callie A M Atta; Kirsten M Fiest; Alexandra D Frolkis; Nathalie Jette; Tamara Pringsheim; Christine St Germaine-Smith; Thilinie Rajapakse; Gilaad G Kaplan; Amy Metcalfe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Use of antihistamine medications during early pregnancy and isolated major malformations.

Authors:  Suzanne M Gilboa; Matthew J Strickland; Andrew F Olshan; Martha M Werler; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2009-02

4.  Birth Defect Co-Occurrence Patterns Among Infants With Cleft Lip and/or Palate.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Navarro Sanchez; Renata H Benjamin; Laura E Mitchell; Peter H Langlois; Mark A Canfield; Michael D Swartz; Angela E Scheuerle; Daryl A Scott; Hope Northrup; Christian P Schaaf; Joseph W Ray; Scott D McLean; Han Chen; Philip J Lupo; A J Agopian
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2021-04-28

5.  Patterns of multiple congenital anomalies in the National Birth Defect Prevention Study: Challenges and insights.

Authors:  Meredith M Howley; Eva Williford; A J Agopian; Angela E Lin; Lorenzo D Botto; Christopher M Cunniff; Paul A Romitti; Eirini Nestoridi; Marilyn L Browne
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 2.661

Review 6.  Genealogical data in population medical genetics: Field guidelines.

Authors:  Fernando A Poletta; Ieda M Orioli; Eduardo E Castilla
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.771

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.