Literature DB >> 8356999

Efficacy of nabumetone versus diclofenac, naproxen, ibuprofen, and piroxicam in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

B J Lister1, M Poland, R E DeLapp.   

Abstract

The efficacy of nabumetone was compared with that of diclofenac, naproxen, ibuprofen, and piroxicam in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter trial. Patients > or = 18 years with clinical and radiographic evidence of OA or RA (functional class I, II, or III), who provided written informed consent, were eligible. To mimic real-life therapy, no washout phase preceded randomization. Eligible patients were assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive nabumetone or a comparator NSAID for 12 weeks. Thus a total of 4,411 eligible patients were randomized to receive nabumetone (N = 3,315) or one of the comparator NSAIDs (N = 1,096). Initial daily doses were: nabumetone, 1,000 mg; diclofenac, 100 mg; naproxen, 500 mg; ibuprofen, 1,200 mg; piroxicam, 10 mg. Dosage increases were permitted after a 2-week trial period. All patients were evaluated at baseline, and at 4 and 12 weeks. Of all patients randomized, approximately 46% had RA and approximately 54% had OA. Demographic characteristics were similar for the nabumetone and comparator NSAID treatment groups. In OA, nabumetone was as effective as the comparator NSAIDs in the physician and patient global assessments of disease activity, in improving the Activities and Lifestyle Index, and in decreasing the degree of pain. There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients withdrawn for lack of efficacy when treated with nabumetone or one of the comparator NSAIDs. In contrast, nabumetone was significantly (p < or = 0.02) more effective than the comparator NSAIDs in RA patients for the global assessments of disease activity, pain relief, and improving the Activities and Lifestyle Index, primarily due to the poor response in the ibuprofen and piroxicam treatment groups. Furthermore, fewer nabumetone-treated RA patients (8.8%) withdrew for lack of efficacy than those treated with diclofenac (10.3%), naproxen (11%), piroxicam (13.5%), or ibuprofen (13.2%). In conclusion, in a large, randomized, open-label trial that mimicked real-life therapy, nabumetone was as effective as diclofenac, naproxen, piroxicam, and ibuprofen for the treatment of patients with OA. However, in RA, nabumetone was significantly more effective than the comparator NSAIDs, and fewer patients were withdrawn because of lack of efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8356999     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90390-b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  14 in total

1.  Non-surgical treatment of osteoarthritis: a half century of "advances".

Authors:  K D Brandt
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  Prophylaxis and treatment of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal disorders.

Authors:  R La Corte; M Caselli; G Castellino; G Bajocchi; F Trotta
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Choice of NSAID and management strategy in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. The impact on costs and outcomes in the UK.

Authors:  C J McCabe; R L Akehurst; J Kirsch; M Whitfield; M Backhouse; A D Woolf; D L Scott; P Emery; I Haslock
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  A novel injection strategy of flurbiprofen axetil by inhibiting protein binding with 6-methoxy-2-naphthylacetic acid.

Authors:  Kenji Ogata; Norito Takamura; Jin Tokunaga; Tetsuya Ikeda; Nao Setoguchi; Kazuhiro Tanda; Tetsuo Yamasaki; Toyotaka Nishio; Keiichi Kawai
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 5.  [New non-steroidal anti-rheumatic drugs: selective inhibitors of inducible cyclooxygenase].

Authors:  D O Stichtenoth; H Zeidler; J C Frölich
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-07-15

Review 6.  Nabumetone: therapeutic use and safety profile in the management of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Thomas Hedner; Ola Samulesson; Peter Währborg; Hans Wadenvik; Kjell-Arne Ung; Anders Ekbom
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  The effectiveness of five strategies for the prevention of gastrointestinal toxicity induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: systematic review.

Authors:  Lee Hooper; Tamara J Brown; Rachel Elliott; Katherine Payne; Chris Roberts; Deborah Symmons
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-10-08

8.  Safety and efficacy of oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis : a six-month randomised study.

Authors:  Wen Shi; Yong Ming Wang; Li Shao Li; Min Yan; Duan Li; Neng Neng Chen; Bin Yan Chen
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.859

9.  Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  Louis Kuritzky; George P Samraj
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 10.  Safety of the nonselective NSAID nabumetone : focus on gastrointestinal tolerability.

Authors:  Bernard Bannwarth
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.228

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.