Literature DB >> 8355342

Prevalence of Brucella sp. antibodies in feral swine in Florida.

M L van der Leek1, H N Becker, P Humphrey, C L Adams, R C Belden, W B Frankenberger, P L Nicoletti.   

Abstract

Serum samples collected from feral swine (Sus scrofa) throughout Florida (USA) from 1974 to 1989 were tested for antibodies to Brucella sp. by the card test, the standard tube test, the rivanol test or the complement fixation test. Seropositive swine were detected at six of 18 sites with a composite prevalence of 23.4% (238 of 1,015 samples; range = 5.5% to 33.3%) for sites with seropositive swine. At one site for which age and sex data were available there was no significant difference (P = 0.50) in seroprevalence between males and females. Antibody prevalence in adult (> or = 8 mo) and juvenile swine (< 8 mo), however, was significantly different (P < 0.05). Based on these data, Brucella sp. infections are limited only to certain populations of feral swine. To avoid the spread of Brucella sp. organisms, however, relocation of feral swine is not recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8355342     DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-29.3.410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wildl Dis        ISSN: 0090-3558            Impact factor:   1.535


  9 in total

1.  Differentiation of Brucella abortus bv. 1, 2, and 4, Brucella melitensis, Brucella ovis, and Brucella suis bv. 1 by PCR.

Authors:  B J Bricker; S M Halling
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Wild boars as sources for infectious diseases in livestock and humans.

Authors:  X J Meng; D S Lindsay; N Sriranganathan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Controlling disease outbreaks in wildlife using limited culling: modelling classical swine fever incursions in wild pigs in Australia.

Authors:  Brendan D Cowled; M Graeme Garner; Katherine Negus; Michael P Ward
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 3.683

4.  Cross-species transmission potential between wild pigs, livestock, poultry, wildlife, and humans: implications for disease risk management in North America.

Authors:  Ryan S Miller; Steven J Sweeney; Chris Slootmaker; Daniel A Grear; Paul A Di Salvo; Deborah Kiser; Stephanie A Shwiff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Swine brucellosis: current perspectives.

Authors:  S C Olsen; F M Tatum
Journal:  Vet Med (Auckl)       Date:  2016-12-20

6.  Wildlife Management Practices Associated with Pathogen Exposure in Non-Native Wild Pigs in Florida, U.S.

Authors:  Amanda N Carr; Michael P Milleson; Felipe A Hernández; Hunter R Merrill; Michael L Avery; Samantha M Wisely
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 5.048

7.  Detection error influences both temporal seroprevalence predictions and risk factors associations in wildlife disease models.

Authors:  Michael A Tabak; Kerri Pedersen; Ryan S Miller
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Brucellosis Initially Misidentified as Ochrobactrum anthropi Bacteremia: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Srinivasa Nithin Gopalsamy; Aditi Ramakrishnan; Mustaf M Shariff; Julie Gabel; Skyler Brennan; Cherie Drenzek; Monica M Farley; Robert P Gaynes; Emily J Cartwright
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.835

9.  Integrating survey and molecular approaches to better understand wildlife disease ecology.

Authors:  Brendan D Cowled; Michael P Ward; Shawn W Laffan; Francesca Galea; M Graeme Garner; Anna J MacDonald; Ian Marsh; Petra Muellner; Katherine Negus; Sumaiya Quasim; Andrew P Woolnough; Stephen D Sarre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.