OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate whether anticoagulation by an intravenous heparin infusion prevents deterioration of coronary blood flow restored by the novel recombinant plasminogen activator BM 06.022, and to compare the effects of profound fibrinogenolysis with those of an intravenous bolus injection of heparin. BACKGROUND: Recent clinical studies indicate that heparin appears to be effective in reducing reocclusion when combined with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA), but that heparin is associated with an increased bleeding incidence. Therefore, the need for heparin has to be critically evaluated in the development of BM 06.022. METHODS: BM 06.022 is an unglycosylated variant of human tissue-type plasminogen activator. Thrombus formation in anesthetized open chest dogs was induced by electrical injury. Left circumflex coronary artery blood flow was monitored for 4 h using an electromagnetic flow probe. Twenty dogs were randomized to receive intravenous heparin (100 IU/kg bolus plus 100 IU/kg per h) in group B or saline solution in group A before an intravenous bolus injection of 200 kU/kg (= 0.34 mg/kg) BM 06.022 1 h after thrombus formation. Another 14 dogs were randomized to receive a single intravenous bolus injection of 200 IU/kg heparin plus 200 kU/kg BM 06.022 in group D or saline solution plus 1,000 kU/kg BM 06.022 in group C. RESULTS: In the absence of a systemic lytic state, heparin infusion prolonged (p < 0.05) the cumulative patency time (sum of time intervals during which the coronary artery was patent) to 204.3 +/- 7.4 min (group B) compared with 34.6 +/- 10.8 min with saline solution (group A), and increased (p < 0.05) the area under the curve for coronary blood flow versus time (AUCFlow) to 34.0 +/- 3.4 ml.h.min-1 compared with 7.7 +/- 4.6 ml.h.min-1. Profound fibrinogenolysis after administration of 1,000 kU/kg BM 06.022 (group C) and a single intravenous heparin injection (group D) did not differ in their effects on the cumulative patency time (182 +/- 30.3 vs. 177.5 +/- 25.4 min) and AUCFlow (36.0 +/- 10.3 vs. 30.5 +/- 4.8 ml.h.min-1), but these values were improved (p < 0.05) compared with those obtained after administration of saline solution plus 200 kU/kg BM 06.022 (group A). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of a systemic lytic state, intravenous heparin is required as an adjunct to BM 06.022 to maintain coronary blood flow in dogs.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate whether anticoagulation by an intravenous heparin infusion prevents deterioration of coronary blood flow restored by the novel recombinant plasminogen activator BM 06.022, and to compare the effects of profound fibrinogenolysis with those of an intravenous bolus injection of heparin. BACKGROUND: Recent clinical studies indicate that heparin appears to be effective in reducing reocclusion when combined with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA), but that heparin is associated with an increased bleeding incidence. Therefore, the need for heparin has to be critically evaluated in the development of BM 06.022. METHODS: BM 06.022 is an unglycosylated variant of humantissue-type plasminogen activator. Thrombus formation in anesthetized open chest dogs was induced by electrical injury. Left circumflex coronary artery blood flow was monitored for 4 h using an electromagnetic flow probe. Twenty dogs were randomized to receive intravenous heparin (100 IU/kg bolus plus 100 IU/kg per h) in group B or saline solution in group A before an intravenous bolus injection of 200 kU/kg (= 0.34 mg/kg) BM 06.022 1 h after thrombus formation. Another 14 dogs were randomized to receive a single intravenous bolus injection of 200 IU/kg heparin plus 200 kU/kg BM 06.022 in group D or saline solution plus 1,000 kU/kg BM 06.022 in group C. RESULTS: In the absence of a systemic lytic state, heparin infusion prolonged (p < 0.05) the cumulative patency time (sum of time intervals during which the coronary artery was patent) to 204.3 +/- 7.4 min (group B) compared with 34.6 +/- 10.8 min with saline solution (group A), and increased (p < 0.05) the area under the curve for coronary blood flow versus time (AUCFlow) to 34.0 +/- 3.4 ml.h.min-1 compared with 7.7 +/- 4.6 ml.h.min-1. Profound fibrinogenolysis after administration of 1,000 kU/kg BM 06.022 (group C) and a single intravenous heparin injection (group D) did not differ in their effects on the cumulative patency time (182 +/- 30.3 vs. 177.5 +/- 25.4 min) and AUCFlow (36.0 +/- 10.3 vs. 30.5 +/- 4.8 ml.h.min-1), but these values were improved (p < 0.05) compared with those obtained after administration of saline solution plus 200 kU/kg BM 06.022 (group A). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of a systemic lytic state, intravenous heparin is required as an adjunct to BM 06.022 to maintain coronary blood flow in dogs.