| Literature DB >> 8354506 |
J H Coverdale1, T L Bayer, L B McCullough, F A Chervenak.
Abstract
Treatment of women patients with chronic mental illness who are at risk of unwanted pregnancies presents ethical challenges to the clinician who wishes to respect the patient's autonomy while also helping her avert the potential adverse consequences of unwanted pregnancy. The clinician who simply allows the patient to continue at risk or coerces her into using contraception may not have adequately considered the variable nature of the patient's autonomy. The authors suggest that the clinician should assess and treat conditions underlying the patient's variable impairment of autonomy to maximize her ability to participate in family planning decisions. Case examples are used to illustrate assessment of patients' decision-making capacity, development of family planning approaches that respect patients' autonomy, and use of a newly available contraceptive implant.Entities:
Keywords: Genetics and Reproduction; Mental Health Therapies; Norplant; Professional Patient Relationship; Behavior; Case Studies; Contraception; Contraceptive Implants; Contraceptive Methods; Contraceptive Usage; Diseases; Ethics; Family Planning; Mental Disorders--women; Philosophical Overview; Psychological Factors; Psychologists; Psychology; Research Methodology; Social Sciences; Studies
Mesh:
Year: 1993 PMID: 8354506 DOI: 10.1176/ps.44.7.671
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hosp Community Psychiatry ISSN: 0022-1597