Literature DB >> 8353616

Phonatory control in male singing: a study of the effects of subglottal pressure, fundamental frequency, and mode of phonation on the voice source.

J Sundberg1, I Titze, R Scherer.   

Abstract

This article describes experiments carried out in order to gain a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying variation of vocal loudness in singers. Ten singers, two of whom are famous professional opera tenor soloists, phonated at different pitches and different loudnesses. Their voice source characteristics were analyzed by inverse filtering the oral airflow signal. It was found that the main physiological variable underlying loudness variation is subglottal pressure (Ps). The voice source property determining most of the loudness variation is the amplitude of the negative peak of the differentiated flow signal, as predicted by previous research. Increases in this amplitude are achieved by (a) increasing the pulse amplitude of the flow waveform; (b) moving the moment of vocal fold contact earlier in time, closer to the center of the pulse; and (c) skewing the pulses. The last mentioned alternative seems dependent on both Ps and the ratio between the fundamental frequency and the first formant. On the average, the singers doubled Ps when they increased fundamental frequency by one octave, and a doubling of the excess Ps over threshold caused the sound pressure level (SPL) to increase by 8-9 dB for neutral phonation, less if mode of phonation was changed to pressed. A shift of mode of phonation from flow over neutral to pressed was associated with a reduction of the peak glottal permittance i.e., the ratio between peak transglottal airflow to Ps. Flow phonation had the most favorable relationship between Ps and SPL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8353616     DOI: 10.1016/s0892-1997(05)80108-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  9 in total

1.  The Relationship Between Physiological Mechanisms and the Self-Perception of Vocal Effort.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Manuel E Diaz-Cadiz; Adrianna C Shembel; Nicole M Enos; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Vocal development in a Waddington landscape.

Authors:  Yayoi Teramoto; Daniel Y Takahashi; Philip Holmes; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Measures of spectral slope using an excised larynx model.

Authors:  Fariborz Alipour; Ronald C Scherer; Eileen Finnegan
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Differential roles for the thyroarytenoid and lateral cricoarytenoid muscles in phonation.

Authors:  Dinesh K Chhetri; Juergen Neubauer
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Radiation fibrosis of the vocal fold: from man to mouse.

Authors:  Michael M Johns; Vasantha Kolachala; Eric Berg; Susan Muller; Frances X Creighton; Ryan C Branski
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Magnitude of Neck-Surface Vibration as an Estimate of Subglottal Pressure During Modulations of Vocal Effort and Intensity in Healthy Speakers.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Andres F Llico; Daryush D Mehta; Joseph S Perkell; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Analysis of vibratory mode changes in symmetric and asymmetric activation of the canine larynx.

Authors:  Patrick Schlegel; David A Berry; Dinesh K Chhetri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Vocal Tradeoffs in Anterior Glottoplasty for Voice Feminization.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Anil Palaparthi; Ted Mau
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.970

9.  Quantitative measurement of vocal fold vibration in male radio performers and healthy controls using high-speed videoendoscopy.

Authors:  Samantha Warhurst; Patricia McCabe; Rob Heard; Edwin Yiu; Gaowu Wang; Catherine Madill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.