Literature DB >> 8353615

Sources of variation in phonetograms.

R F Coleman1.   

Abstract

Despite the growing popularity of the phonetogram or F0-SPL Profile in the United States and its continuing use in Europe, it is generally acknowledge that a wide range of results are obtained by different investigators using the technique. Nonuniformity of results calls into question the basic validity of the method as a descriptor of vocal function limits. This article reviews some of the more common diversities in methods among investigators and suggests that variation of results in voice profiles may be as much an indication of nonstandardization of technique as in the inherent variability of subjects.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8353615     DOI: 10.1016/s0892-1997(05)80107-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  3 in total

1.  Vocal risk factors for occupational voice disorders in female teaching students.

Authors:  Berit Schneider; Wolfgang Bigenzahn
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Dynamics of Intrinsic Laryngeal Muscle Contraction.

Authors:  Andrew M Vahabzadeh-Hagh; Pranati Pillutla; Zhaoyan Zhang; Dinesh K Chhetri
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  The speech range profile (SRP): an easy and useful tool to assess vocal limits.

Authors:  L D'Alatri; M R Marchese
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.124

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.