Literature DB >> 8353351

Percutaneous cholecystostomy for suspected acute cholecystitis in the hospitalized patient.

P D Browning1, J P McGahan, E O Gerscovich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors evaluated the outcome of 49 hospitalized patients with sepsis and possible acute cholecystitis in whom emergency percutaneous cholecystostomy was attempted on 50 occasions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All cholecystostomy procedures were performed with ultrasound (US) guidance by using either the trocar (n = 35) or the Seldinger (n = 15) technique. Forty of the 50 cholecystostomies (80%) were attempted at the patients' bedside, and 49 of the 50 catheters (98%) were placed successfully.
RESULTS: Twenty-five of these patients eventually died of other causes (51%), but there was clinical improvement in 31 of the 49 patients (63%) based on a 72-hour decrease of temperature to less than 37.3 degrees C, normalization of white blood cell count, and/or resolution of abdominal pain. US findings were correlated with clinical response. Clinical improvement occurred most frequently after cholecystostomy in patients with either a distended gallbladder (74%), pericholecystic fluid (80%), or gallstones (92%). Forty-three of the 49 patients underwent cholecystostomy alone (88%), and six required further procedures (12%). There were six complications (12%) including catheter dislodgment (n = 3), hematoma (n = 1), and severe pain (n = 2). No deaths were directly attributed to percutaneous cholecystostomy.
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous cholecystostomy performed in septic hospitalized patients is a low-risk procedure that may be helpful in the treatment of some patients with suspected acute cholecystitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8353351     DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(93)71915-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  6 in total

1.  Ultrasound guided percutaneous cholecystostomy in high-risk patients for surgical intervention.

Authors:  Huseyin Bakkaloglu; Hakan Yanar; Recep Guloglu; Korhan Taviloglu; Fatih Tunca; Murat Aksoy; Cemalettin Ertekin; Arzu Poyanli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Systematic review of cholecystostomy as a treatment option in acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Anders Winbladh; Per Gullstrand; Joar Svanvik; Per Sandström
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Outcome after percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Yun-Cheng Hsieh; Chun-Ku Chen; Chien-Wei Su; Che-Chang Chan; Teh-Ia Huo; Chia-Jen Liu; Wen-Liang Fang; Kuei-Chuan Lee; Han-Chieh Lin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystostomy with delayed cholecystectomy as an alternative to conversion to open procedure.

Authors:  G G Kuster; D Domagk
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Percutaneous cholecystostomy: An update for the 2020s.

Authors:  Hakki Muammer Karakas; Gulsah Yildirim; Mehmet Mahir Fersahoglu; Ozge Findik
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2021-10-06

6.  Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Acute Cholecystitis after Successful Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Treatment and the Risk Factors for Recurrence: A Decade Experience at a Single Center.

Authors:  Chih-Hung Wang; Cheng-Yi Wu; Justin Cheng-Ta Yang; Wan-Ching Lien; Hsiu-Po Wang; Kao-Lang Liu; Yao-Ming Wu; Shyr-Chyr Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.