Literature DB >> 8353106

Measuring medical students' empathy skills.

B J Evans1, R O Stanley, G D Burrows.   

Abstract

Empathy is an important skill for the medical practitioner or medical students to develop when interviewing patients. It helps the interviewer establish effective communication, which is important for accurate diagnosis and patient management. Two facets of medical education limit students' development of accurate empathy: the traditional format of interviewing training and the social ethos of medical training and medical practice, which stress clinical detachment. A number of researchers and educators have developed consulting skills training programmes, designed to enhance students' empathic skills and ability. One difficulty for researchers has been the conceptual complexity of the term 'empathy' and greater difficulty in measuring the dimension. This paper reviews the range of approaches to the measurement of empathy and reports on a research study designed to evaluate a two-stage measurement technique, involving a pencil-and-paper test of empathy and independent observer ratings of medical students' actual interview behaviours. Results lead to the conclusion that pencil-and-paper tests of empathy cannot incorporate the range of complex cognitive, emotional and behavioural components of the empathy construct. On the other hand, trained observers have been able to use items on a specially developed History-taking Rating Scale to discriminate between the empathic behaviours of a group of students trained in consulting skills with those of a group of control students who each carried out videotaped history-taking interviews with hospitalized patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8353106     DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1993.tb01735.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Med Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1129


  16 in total

1.  Effect of Clinician Feedback Versus Video Self-Assessment in 5th-Year Chiropractic Students on an End-of-Year Communication Skills Examination.

Authors:  Mark D Hecimovich; Jo-Anne Maire; Barrett Losco
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2010

2.  Religion, health, and questions of meaning.

Authors:  Sonal Singh
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-08-17

Review 3.  Assessing empathy development in medical education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandra H Sulzer; Noah W Feinstein; Claire L Wendland
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Relationship between increased personal well-being and enhanced empathy among internal medicine residents.

Authors:  Tait D Shanafelt; Colin West; Xinghua Zhao; Paul Novotny; Joseph Kolars; Thomas Habermann; Jeff Sloan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Fostering a healing presence and investigating its mediators.

Authors:  Sharon I McDonough-Means; Mary Jo Kreitzer; Iris R Bell
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.579

Review 6.  Educating for empathy. A review.

Authors:  Kathy A Stepien; Amy Baernstein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Effect of a biopsychosocial approach on patient satisfaction and patterns of care.

Authors:  Alon P A Margalit; Shimon M Glick; Jochanan Benbassat; Ayala Cohen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Interventions for improving medical students' interpersonal communication in medical consultations.

Authors:  Conor Gilligan; Martine Powell; Marita C Lynagh; Bernadette M Ward; Chris Lonsdale; Pam Harvey; Erica L James; Dominique Rich; Sari P Dewi; Smriti Nepal; Hayley A Croft; Jonathan Silverman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-08

9.  Physicians' messages in problematic sickness certification: a narrative analysis of case reports.

Authors:  Monika Engblom; Kristina Alexanderson; Carl Edvard Rudebeck
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  How do distress and well-being relate to medical student empathy? A multicenter study.

Authors:  Matthew R Thomas; Liselotte N Dyrbye; Jefrey L Huntington; Karen L Lawson; Paul J Novotny; Jeff A Sloan; Tait D Shanafelt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.