OBJECTIVE: Analysis of the different ambulatory blood pressure monitoring derived parameters in terms of cardiac structural repercussion, in patients with isolated systolic and mild systolic-diastolic hypertension. SETTING: Prospective study involving simultaneously the two-dimensional echocardiographic technique and the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring method. PATIENTS: Out patients regularly observed in the Cardiology Department of Egas Moniz Hospital in Lisbon, were included in our study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied 50 hypertensive patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria of our study (Group H) and 20 subjects who were the normal aged matched population (Group N). through ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, in each individual of these two groups, we considered the mean values of daily systolic blood and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate and ambulatory heart rate blood pressure product. Through two-dimensional echocardiography we calculated the left ventricular mass and the correspondent index corrected for the body surface. RESULTS: In the H group an comparing to the N group, the mean value of the daily systolic blood pressure was 112 +/- 6 mmHg and 159 +/- 8 mmHg (p < 0.001) respectively, diastolic blood pressure was 60 +/- 5 mmHg and 75 +/- 7 mmHg respectively (p < 0.001), heart rate blood pressure product was 6720 +/- 580 and 12561 +/- 678 (p < 0.0001) and of the left ventricular mass index was 109 +/- 10 gm2 and 145 +/- 7 g/m2 (p < 0.001). The correlation coefficient between the left ventricular mass index and mean systolic, diastolic blood pressures and ambulatory heart rate blood pressure product was 0.60 (p < 0.01), 0.45 (p = NS) and 0.73 (p < 0.001) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the evaluation of the increase in left ventricular mass, ambulatory heart rate blood pressure product is a more accurate parameter compared to the mean daily blood pressure values. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is a method with a great potential and clinical application, when studying patients with hypertension diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: Analysis of the different ambulatory blood pressure monitoring derived parameters in terms of cardiac structural repercussion, in patients with isolated systolic and mild systolic-diastolic hypertension. SETTING: Prospective study involving simultaneously the two-dimensional echocardiographic technique and the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring method. PATIENTS: Out patients regularly observed in the Cardiology Department of Egas Moniz Hospital in Lisbon, were included in our study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied 50 hypertensivepatients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria of our study (Group H) and 20 subjects who were the normal aged matched population (Group N). through ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, in each individual of these two groups, we considered the mean values of daily systolic blood and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate and ambulatory heart rate blood pressure product. Through two-dimensional echocardiography we calculated the left ventricular mass and the correspondent index corrected for the body surface. RESULTS: In the H group an comparing to the N group, the mean value of the daily systolic blood pressure was 112 +/- 6 mmHg and 159 +/- 8 mmHg (p < 0.001) respectively, diastolic blood pressure was 60 +/- 5 mmHg and 75 +/- 7 mmHg respectively (p < 0.001), heart rate blood pressure product was 6720 +/- 580 and 12561 +/- 678 (p < 0.0001) and of the left ventricular mass index was 109 +/- 10 gm2 and 145 +/- 7 g/m2 (p < 0.001). The correlation coefficient between the left ventricular mass index and mean systolic, diastolic blood pressures and ambulatory heart rate blood pressure product was 0.60 (p < 0.01), 0.45 (p = NS) and 0.73 (p < 0.001) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the evaluation of the increase in left ventricular mass, ambulatory heart rate blood pressure product is a more accurate parameter compared to the mean daily blood pressure values. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is a method with a great potential and clinical application, when studying patients with hypertension diagnosis.