Literature DB >> 8352625

A multicenter study on the use of pulsed low-intensity direct current for healing chronic stage II and stage III decubitus ulcers.

J M Wood1, P E Evans, K U Schallreuter, W E Jacobson, R Sufit, J Newman, C White, M Jacobson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
DESIGN: Pulsed low-intensity direct current (300 to 600 microA) has been used in a double-blind placebo multicenter study in the treatment of stage II and stage III chronic decubitus ulcers.
RESULTS: Seventy-four ulcers were treated in four centers. Forty-three patients were selected for the experimental group, and 31 control subjects used the sham instrument (placebo group). In the treated group, 25 ulcers (58%) healed in 8 weeks, whereas in the placebo group, only one ulcer (3%) healed and most ulcers increased in size. Statistical analysis, based on surface area and ulcer depth before and after treatment, showed that low-intensity direct current had a significant influence on the healing rates for these ulcers (P < .0001). Experiments with guinea pigs (n = 10) showed that pulsed low-intensity direct current caused a rapid calcium flux in the epidermis.
CONCLUSIONS: Pulsed low-intensity direct current represents a useful approach for the treatment of stage II and stage III chronic decubitus ulcers by increasing the healing rate. The growth of fibroblasts and keratinocytes may be enhanced by pulsed low-intensity direct current due to changes in calcium homeostasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8352625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  21 in total

Review 1.  High-Voltage Pulsed Current Electrical Stimulation in Wound Treatment.

Authors:  Anna Polak; Andrzej Franek; Jakub Taradaj
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  The Electrical Response to Injury: Molecular Mechanisms and Wound Healing.

Authors:  Brian Reid; Min Zhao
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Electrical Stimulation Technologies for Wound Healing.

Authors:  Luther C Kloth
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Clinical Trials Involving Biphasic Pulsed Current, MicroCurrent, and/or Low-Intensity Direct Current.

Authors:  Pamela E Houghton
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  Electrostimulation: Current Status, Strength of Evidence Guidelines, and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gerard Koel; Pamela E Houghton
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  The analgesic effect of electrostimulation (WoundEL®) in the treatment of leg ulcers.

Authors:  Pauline Leloup; Pascal Toussaint; Jean-Paul Lembelembe; Philippe Célérier; Hervé Maillard
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  [Importance of modern treatment procedures for infected and colonized wounds in dermatology].

Authors:  G Daeschlein; S Lutze; A Arnold; S von Podewils; M Jünger
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.751

8.  Management of chronic pressure ulcers: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-07-01

9.  Transient electric changes immediately after surgical trauma.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Driban; C Buz Swanik; Kellie C Huxel; Easwaran Balsubramanian
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 10.  Biomedical applications of electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Siwei Zhao; Abijeet Singh Mehta; Min Zhao
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.