Literature DB >> 8352290

Case-control study of congenital defects and parental employment in health care.

T D Matte1, J Mulinare, J D Erickson.   

Abstract

Health care workers may be occupationally exposed to known and suspected teratogens including viruses, anesthetic gases, sterilants, mercury, and x-radiation. To assess the risk of congenital defects among offspring of health care workers, we analyzed parental occupational histories for 4,915 case babies with congenital defects, registered during the years 1968-1980 by the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP) registry, and for 3,027 control babies born without defects during the same period. Offspring of mothers employed in a nursing occupation during the periconceptional period had a modest excess risk of having at least one congenital defect (relative risk [RR] = 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.88); the offspring were at statistically significant increased risk of having anencephaly or spina bifida (RR = 2.00; 95% CI 1.01-4.30), coarctation of the aorta (RR = 2.06; 95% CI 1.10-3.82), genital system defects (RR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.03-2.53), and urinary system defects (RR = 3.43; 95% CI 1.41-8.34). These associations were not confounded by maternal age, education, or alcohol consumption. Offspring of mothers employed in administrative or clerical jobs in the health care industry also had a modest excess risk of defects (RR = 1.35; 95% CI 0.96-1.90), including a statistically significant excess risk of limb defects. We also found associations between neural tube defects and potential exposure to anesthetic gases and to x-radiation, but each association was based on only three case babies of potentially exposed parents. We found no associations between defects and paternal health care employment, except for a few individual defects, and these were based on small numbers of exposed subjects. Only one of five previous studies reviewed found an increased risk of congenital defects among offspring of nurses, but three of the four negative studies had substantially smaller sample sizes than the present study. Detection bias may be a possible explanation for the apparent excess risk of certain defects among offspring of nurses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8352290     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.4700240103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  13 in total

Review 1.  Review of recent epidemiological studies on paternal occupations and birth defects.

Authors:  S-E Chia; L-M Shi
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Maternal occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and birth defects.

Authors:  Awi Wiesel; Claudia Spix; Andreas Mergenthaler; Annette Queisser-Luft
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Maternal occupational exposure during pregnancy and the risk of spina bifida.

Authors:  B M Blatter; N Roeleveld; G A Zielhuis; F J Gabreëls; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  The effect of occupational exposure to mercury vapour on the fertility of female dental assistants.

Authors:  P J Colquitt
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Rates of congenital anomalies and other adverse birth outcomes in an offspring cohort of registered nurses from British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  Laura T Arbour; Kris Beking; Nhu D Le; Pamela A Ratner; John J Spinelli; Kay Teschke; Richard P Gallagher; Zenaida U Abanto; Helen Dimich-Ward
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2010 May-Jun

6.  Spina bifida and parental occupation: results from three malformation monitoring programs in Europe.

Authors:  B M Blatter; N Roeleveld; E Bermejo; M L Martínez-Frías; C Siffel; A E Czeizel
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Maternal occupation and the risk of major birth defects: a follow-up analysis from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

Authors:  Shao Lin; Michele L Herdt-Losavio; Bonnie R Chapman; Jean-Pierre Munsie; Andrew F Olshan; Charlotte M Druschel
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 5.840

8.  Evaluating the effects of maternal exposure to benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylene on oral clefts among offspring in Texas: 1999-2008.

Authors:  Anushuya Ramakrishnan; Philip J Lupo; A J Agopian; Stephen H Linder; Thomas H Stock; Peter H Langlois; Elena Craft
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2013-07-25

9.  Cancer incidence and adverse pregnancy outcome in registered nurses potentially exposed to antineoplastic drugs.

Authors:  Pamela A Ratner; John J Spinelli; Kris Beking; Maria Lorenzi; Yat Chow; Kay Teschke; Nhu D Le; Richard P Gallagher; Helen Dimich-Ward
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2010-09-16

Review 10.  Parental risk factors and anorectal malformations: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nadine Zwink; Ekkehart Jenetzky; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.123

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.