Literature DB >> 8352184

Clinical and hemodynamic predictors of survival in patients aged < 65 years with severe congestive heart failure secondary to ischemic or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

M Anguita1, J M Arizón, G Bueno, J M Latre, M Sancho, F Torres, D Giménez, M Concha, F Vallés.   

Abstract

To identify which clinical or hemodynamic parameters predict survival in patients with end-stage heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy, 130 consecutive patients aged < 65 years (mean 46 +/- 13) assessed for heart transplantation from May 1986 to April 1991 were studied. Mean follow-up was 15 +/- 11 months. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 22 +/- 7%. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was 27 +/- 9 mm Hg, and cardiac index was 2.2 +/- 0.6 liter/min/m2. Symptom class was IV in 91% of patients and III in 9%. Etiology was ischemic in 40% of patients and idiopathic in 60%. After intensive medical therapy, heart transplantation was considered indicated in 53% of patients, contraindicated in 20% and not indicated in 27%. Transplantation was performed in 36% of patients during follow-up, and 35% died and 29% were alive without transplantation. A comparison, excluding patients with transplantation, was performed between those who were alive and had survived > or = 6 months after assessment, and those who died. On multivariate analysis, the following 3 parameters were independent predictors of prognosis: intravenous inotropic requirement (p < 0.001), maximal, tolerated captopril dose (p = 0.013) and systolic blood pressure (p = 0.003). When patients with transplantation were considered as deaths, stabilization on medical therapy also reached statistical significance (p = 0.009). Classic prognostic markers including ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, cardiac index, amiodarone therapy and etiology were not associated with prognosis in this homogeneous population of severely ill patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8352184     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)91132-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

Review 1.  Mitral valve reconstruction in the patient with heart failure.

Authors:  S F Bolling
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Mitral valve surgery simultaneous to coronary revascularization in patients with end-stage ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Massimo Bonacchi; Edvin Prifti; Massimo Maiani; Giacomo Frati; Nadia S Nathan; Marzia Leacche
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  Surgical treatment of functional mitral regurgitation in dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Hussein S Al-Amri; Abdulrahman M Al-Moghairi; Rieda M El Oakley
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2011-04-16

4.  Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in selected patients is superior to the conventional approach for patients with severely depressed left ventricular function.

Authors:  Guido Marco Caputti; José Honório Palma; Diego Felipe Gaia; Enio Buffolo
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  Surgery of secondary mitral insufficiency in patients with impaired left ventricular function.

Authors:  Andreas Rukosujew; Stefan Klotz; Henryk Welp; Christian Bruch; Farshad Ghezelbash; Christoph Schmidt; Raluca Weber; Andreas Hoffmeier; Jürgen Sindermann; Hans H Scheld
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Influence of diabetes mellitus on heart failure risk and outcome.

Authors:  Christophe Bauters; Nicolas Lamblin; Eugène P Mc Fadden; Eric Van Belle; Alain Millaire; Pascal de Groote
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2003-01-08       Impact factor: 9.951

Review 7.  Comparison of Hemodynamic Factors Predicting Prognosis in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Margot Aalders; Wouter Kok
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.