Literature DB >> 8351603

A prospective randomized trial comparing pneumoperitoneum and U-shaped retractor elevation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

S Kitano1, Y Iso, M Tomikawa, M Moriyama, K Sugimachi.   

Abstract

Between April and August 1991, 83 Japanese patients with symptomatic gallstones underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our clinics. A prospective randomized trial was carried out to examine the safety, efficacy, and complications of the two techniques, pneumoperitoneum vs an elevating method using a U-shaped retractor. Forty-two patients were randomly allocated to the pneumoperitoneum (P) group and 41 to the U-shaped retractor (U) group. These two groups were well matched with respect to age, sex, etiology, and the severity of the chronic cholecystitis. Laparoscopic resection was successful for 88.1% (37/42) in the P group and 100% (41/41) in the U group. In patients with a severe fibrotic gallbladder, the rate of success was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the U group (100%, 6/6) than in the P group (11.8%, 1/6). In the moderately inflamed group, the operation time (mean +/- SD) was significantly (P < 0.01) less in the U group (58.7 +/- 22.7) than in the P group (87.3 +/- 18.3). With the U-shaped retractor the usual surgical instruments can be used, and a rapid and safer laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be carried out. We prefer this approach to a pneumoperitoneum for patients with an inflamed gallbladder as hospital stay and pain are minimal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8351603     DOI: 10.1007/bf00725947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  5 in total

1.  A safe and simple method to maintain a clear field of vision during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Kitano; M Tomikawa; Y Iso; S Iwata; K Gondo; M Moriyama; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; G Berci; C K McSherry
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. A comparison with mini-lap cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E J Reddick; D O Olsen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Hypercarbia during carbon dioxide gas insufflation for therapeutic laparoscopy: a note of caution.

Authors:  M Holzman; K Sharp; W Richards
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1992-03

5.  Laparoscopic guided cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K A Zucker; R W Bailey; T R Gadacz; A L Imbembo
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.565

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Gasless laparoscopy in abdominal surgery.

Authors:  V Paolucci; C N Gutt; B Schaeff; A Encke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Hemodynamic and arterial blood gas changes during carbon dioxide and helium pneumoperitoneum in pigs.

Authors:  K Shuto; S Kitano; T Yoshida; T Bandoh; Y Mitarai; M Kobayashi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Randomized comparison of conventional and gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operative technique, postoperative course, and recovery.

Authors:  J F Larsen; P Ejstrud; J U Kristensen; F Svendsen; F Redke; V Pedersen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Laparoscopic entry techniques.

Authors:  Gaity Ahmad; Jade Baker; John Finnerty; Kevin Phillips; Andrew Watson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-18

Review 5.  Clinical effectiveness of gasless laparoscopic surgery for abdominal conditions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  N Aruparayil; W Bolton; A Mishra; L Bains; J Gnanaraj; R King; T Ensor; N King; D Jayne; B Shinkins
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Cost-effectiveness of gasless laparoscopy as a means to increase provision of minimally invasive surgery for abdominal conditions in rural North-East India.

Authors:  Bryony Dawkins; Noel Aruparayil; Tim Ensor; Jesudian Gnanaraj; Julia Brown; David Jayne; Bethany Shinkins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.