Literature DB >> 8351341

Frameless stereotaxic integration of CT imaging data: accuracy and initial applications.

S J Zinreich1, S A Tebo, D M Long, H Brem, D E Mattox, M E Loury, C A vander Kolk, W M Koch, D W Kennedy, R N Bryan.   

Abstract

To evaluate the spatial accuracy of a rapid interactive method of transferring computed tomographic (CT) information between its display on a computer screen to its source (test object, operating field), a multidimensional computer combined with a six-jointed position-sensing mechanical arm was tested with a Plexiglas model consisting of 50 rods of varied height and known location, a plastic replica of the skull, and, subsequently, three patients. The median error value between image and real location was 1-2 mm (P > .95), regardless of the registration target sites. The accuracy, however, increased with the selection of widespread registration points, and 95% of all errors were below 3.70 mm (P > .95). The results compare favorably with the four most commonly used stereotaxic framed units. A misregistration error of 0.3-2.2 mm was found during intraoperative correlation between anatomy on the CT display and actual anatomic location in the operative field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8351341     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.188.3.8351341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  15 in total

1.  [Precision of navigation-assisted surgery of the thoracic and lumbar spine].

Authors:  M Arand; M Schempf; D Hebold; S Teller; L Kinzl; F Gebhard
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Computer-aided navigation in neurosurgery.

Authors:  P Grunert; K Darabi; J Espinosa; R Filippi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  [3-D navigation in the petrous bone with submillimeter accuracy].

Authors:  F Kral; W Freysinger
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Practical Applications of Image-Guided Navigation during Anterior Craniofacial Resection.

Authors:  R L Carrau; H D Curtin; C H Snyderman; J Bumpous; M Stechison
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1995

5.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the challenge of coil placement: a comparison of conventional and stereotaxic neuronavigational strategies.

Authors:  Roland Sparing; Dorothee Buelte; Ingo G Meister; Tomás Paus; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Stereotactic technology in tumor surgery: concepts and principles.

Authors:  D W Roberts
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 7.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation during PET: reaching and verifying the target site.

Authors:  T Paus; M Wolforth
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation during positron emission tomography: a new method for studying connectivity of the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  T Paus; R Jech; C J Thompson; R Comeau; T Peters; A C Evans
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  [The anterosigmoidal approach. A function-preserving surgical method for petroclival tumors].

Authors:  J Schipper; G J Ridder; W Maier; U Spetzger
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  [First experiences with computer-assisted frameless stereotactic interstitial brachytherapy (CASIB)].

Authors:  R J Bale; W Freysinger; A Martin; M Vogele; T Auer; P Eichberger; E Hensler; A Sztankay; T Auberger; A R Gunkel; W F Thumfart; P Lukas
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.