Literature DB >> 8351249

Departmental audit in histopathology.

I A Cree1, W Guthrie, J M Anderson, M P Holley, D Hopwood, D S Sanders, D M Parham, S Lang, J Lang, J S Beck.   

Abstract

Audit is now part of any laboratory service. Histopathology is no exception, and we have set up a system which allows us to review 4% of our specimens. These specimens are identified using a random number generator and reviewed by a consultant pathologist. Both slides and wet specimens are reviewed and graded according to a set scheme. The results from the first year of operation (1990) show a high rate of accuracy with no serious diagnostic disagreements between the auditor and the reporting pathologist. However, some errors which we would wish to prevent were detected and the audit has allowed us to take corrective measures. In our opinion, this form of audit is useful and necessary to maintain good clinical practice. The cost is considerable--histopathology is by its nature labour intensive. Recognition of this fact by health boards is essential if such systems are to continue.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8351249     DOI: 10.1016/S0344-0338(11)80335-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Res Pract        ISSN: 0344-0338            Impact factor:   3.250


  3 in total

1.  Assessing diagnostic errors: when is suspension of a pathologist justified?

Authors:  M Lesna
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  A questionnaire-based survey of errors in diagnostic histopathology throughout the United Kingdom.

Authors:  P N Furness; I Lauder
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  External quality assurance as a revalidation method for pathologists in pediatric histopathology: Comparison of four international programs.

Authors:  Consolato Sergi; Gregor Mikuz
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2008-11-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.