BACKGROUND: Melanocytes in the normal human epidermis are generally dendritic and neither proliferate nor express melanoma-associated antigens. In culture, on the other hand, melanocytes are bi- to tripolar, proliferate with 2 to 4 day doubling times, and express melanoma-associated antigens. This observation prompted us to investigate the regulatory role of keratinocytes for growth, morphology, and antigen expression of melanocytes. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Melanocytes and keratinocytes were cultured under three different co-culture conditions: (a) separated by a semiporous membrane, (b) in monolayer cultures allowing direct contact between cells, and (c) in three-dimensional epidermal reconstructs. RESULTS: Melanocytes separated from keratinocytes by semiporous membranes remained di- and tripolar and could not proliferate in medium optimal for keratinocytes. When cell-cell contact was established between melanocytes and undifferentiated, but not differentiated, keratinocytes, melanocytes proliferated at a rate similar to keratinocytes and they developed multiple dendrites. In co-cultures allowing the multi-layered growth of keratinocytes, melanocytes were nonproliferative when juxtaposed to undifferentiated keratinocytes in the basal layer, but proliferated when surrounded by differentiated keratinocytes in the intermediate and upper layers. Expression of melanoma-associated antigens on melanocytes decreased to similar levels as in normal skin when melanocytes were in direct contact with undifferentiated, but not differentiated, keratinocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Undifferentiated, but not differentiated, keratinocytes control growth, morphology, and antigen expression of melanocytes through direct cell-cell contact. These results suggest that the phenotypic characteristics of nevus and melanoma cells in the dermis, i.e., proliferation and expression of tumor-associated antigens, may be due to their loss of contact with undifferentiation keratinocytes.
BACKGROUND: Melanocytes in the normal human epidermis are generally dendritic and neither proliferate nor express melanoma-associated antigens. In culture, on the other hand, melanocytes are bi- to tripolar, proliferate with 2 to 4 day doubling times, and express melanoma-associated antigens. This observation prompted us to investigate the regulatory role of keratinocytes for growth, morphology, and antigen expression of melanocytes. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Melanocytes and keratinocytes were cultured under three different co-culture conditions: (a) separated by a semiporous membrane, (b) in monolayer cultures allowing direct contact between cells, and (c) in three-dimensional epidermal reconstructs. RESULTS: Melanocytes separated from keratinocytes by semiporous membranes remained di- and tripolar and could not proliferate in medium optimal for keratinocytes. When cell-cell contact was established between melanocytes and undifferentiated, but not differentiated, keratinocytes, melanocytes proliferated at a rate similar to keratinocytes and they developed multiple dendrites. In co-cultures allowing the multi-layered growth of keratinocytes, melanocytes were nonproliferative when juxtaposed to undifferentiated keratinocytes in the basal layer, but proliferated when surrounded by differentiated keratinocytes in the intermediate and upper layers. Expression of melanoma-associated antigens on melanocytes decreased to similar levels as in normal skin when melanocytes were in direct contact with undifferentiated, but not differentiated, keratinocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Undifferentiated, but not differentiated, keratinocytes control growth, morphology, and antigen expression of melanocytes through direct cell-cell contact. These results suggest that the phenotypic characteristics of nevus and melanoma cells in the dermis, i.e., proliferation and expression of tumor-associated antigens, may be due to their loss of contact with undifferentiation keratinocytes.
Authors: E S Atillasoy; J T Seykora; P W Soballe; R Elenitsas; M Nesbit; D E Elder; K T Montone; E Sauter; M Herlyn Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: F Meier; M Nesbit; M Y Hsu; B Martin; P Van Belle; D E Elder; G Schaumburg-Lever; C Garbe; T M Walz; P Donatien; T M Crombleholme; M Herlyn Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Koen Jacobs; Mireille Van Gele; Ramses Forsyth; Lieve Brochez; Barbara Vanhoecke; Olivier De Wever; Marc Bracke Journal: Mol Cancer Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 27.401
Authors: Aleksandar Sekulic; Paul Haluska; Arlo J Miller; Josep Genebriera De Lamo; Samuel Ejadi; Jose S Pulido; Diva R Salomao; Erik C Thorland; Richard G Vile; David L Swanson; Barbara A Pockaj; Susan D Laman; Mark R Pittelkow; Svetomir N Markovic Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Basil Horst; Sofia K Gruvberger-Saal; Benjamin D Hopkins; Lindsey Bordone; Ying Yang; Karen A Chernoff; Ijeoma Uzoma; Volker Schwipper; Jutta Liebau; Norma J Nowak; Georg Brunner; David Owens; David L Rimm; Ramon Parsons; Julide Tok Celebi Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 4.307