BACKGROUND: Surgery to correct extensive alopecia requires increasing the surface of hair-bearing scalp and removing bald scalp. Two commonly used methods, scalp expansion and scalp reduction, have disadvantages. OBJECTIVE: To describe a new method, scalp extension, that employs a thin sheet of bioplastic (an extender) stretched and attached with hooks to the galea after scalp reduction. METHODS: The surgical technique is described and the results compared with those of patients who have undergone scalp reduction and scalp expansion. A study of the first fifteen cases treated is presented. RESULTS: During the few weeks that the extender is implanted, the constant tension it exerts on the galea causes a progressive stretching of the scalp. Data from the first fifteen cases treated reveal eradication of more extensive bald areas than with scalp reduction, making it possible to cut the number of operations necessary in half while considerably shortening total treatment time. The absence of major side effects, along with the absence of any deformation of the scalp (unlike scalp expansion), explains the excellent acceptability of the instrument by patients. CONCLUSION: Scalp extension appears to be a useful adjunctive technique in hair replacement and reconstructive surgery, and has distinct advantages over standard scalp reduction and tissue expansion techniques.
BACKGROUND: Surgery to correct extensive alopecia requires increasing the surface of hair-bearing scalp and removing bald scalp. Two commonly used methods, scalp expansion and scalp reduction, have disadvantages. OBJECTIVE: To describe a new method, scalp extension, that employs a thin sheet of bioplastic (an extender) stretched and attached with hooks to the galea after scalp reduction. METHODS: The surgical technique is described and the results compared with those of patients who have undergone scalp reduction and scalp expansion. A study of the first fifteen cases treated is presented. RESULTS: During the few weeks that the extender is implanted, the constant tension it exerts on the galea causes a progressive stretching of the scalp. Data from the first fifteen cases treated reveal eradication of more extensive bald areas than with scalp reduction, making it possible to cut the number of operations necessary in half while considerably shortening total treatment time. The absence of major side effects, along with the absence of any deformation of the scalp (unlike scalp expansion), explains the excellent acceptability of the instrument by patients. CONCLUSION:Scalp extension appears to be a useful adjunctive technique in hair replacement and reconstructive surgery, and has distinct advantages over standard scalp reduction and tissue expansion techniques.
Authors: C Marquardt; E Bölke; P A Gerber; G Kukova; M Peiper; E Rusnak; K Orth; W Fleischmann Journal: Eur J Med Res Date: 2009-11-03 Impact factor: 2.175