Literature DB >> 8348761

The noninvasive assessment of myocardial viability.

M Ragosta1, G A Beller.   

Abstract

The major objective of noninvasive imaging for detection of myocardial viability is to assist in the improved selection of patients with coronary artery disease and severe left ventricular dysfunction who would benefit most from revascularization. The techniques most commonly used to identify viable myocardium are thallium-201 (201Tl) scintigraphy, positron emission tomography (PET) using a flow tracer in combination with a metabolic tracer, technetium-99m (99mTc) sestamibi imaging, and dobutamine echocardiography. On stress 201Tl scintigraphy, asynergic regions showing normal thallium uptake, an initial defect with delayed redistribution at 3-4 h, late redistribution at 24 h, or defect reversibility after reinjection of a second dose of 201Tl at rest all suggest preserved viability. The greater the final uptake of 201Tl in areas of regional myocardial dysfunction preoperatively, the greater the improvement in ejection fraction after coronary revascularization. Demonstration of uptake of fluoro-18 deoxyglucose (FDG) in regions of diminished blood flow on PET imaging also correlates well with improved systolic function after revascularization. 99mTc sestamibi may also be useful for assessment of myocardial viability, particularly after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Dobutamine echocardiography has good positive predictive value for viability determination, but absence of systolic thickening in an akinetic zone in response to intravenous infusion of the drug may still be associated with viable myocardium in 25-50% of segments. Of all the techniques cited above, quantitative resting 201Tl scintigraphy may be the best approach for distinguishing between viable and irreversibly injured myocardium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8348761     DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960160704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  6 in total

Review 1.  An overview of contemporary nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  Howard C Lewin; Maria G Sciammarella; Thomas A Watters; Herbert G Alexander
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Q-wave regression after acute myocardial infarction assessed by Tl-201 myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Wen-Chol Voon; Yu-Wen Chen; Chien-Chin Hsu; Wen-Ter Lai; Sheng-Hsiung Sheu
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  FDG imaging should be considered the preferred technique for accurate assessment of myocardial viability: against.

Authors:  Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Does fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose metabolic imaging of tumours benefit oncology?

Authors:  C S Brock; S R Meikle; P Price
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-06

5.  Tc-99m tetrofosmin tomography after nitrate administration in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction: relation to metabolic imaging by PET.

Authors:  Wei He; Wanda Acampa; Ciro Mainolfi; Francesco Menna; Anna Rita Sorrentino; Mario Petretta; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Practical Implications of Myocardial Viability Studies.

Authors:  Wilter Dos Santos Ker; Thais Helena Peixoto Nunes; Marcelo Souto Nacif; Claudio Tinoco Mesquita
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.000

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.