Endogenous chemical mediators of ventricular arrhythmias in ischaemic heart disease.

The causes of ventricular arrhythmias in the acute setting of coronary artery disease (myocardial ischaemia and reperfusion) may be approached using two paradigms. One, the electrophysiological paradigm (disturbance of ionic homeostasis, electrogenesis, and conduction) has not been addressed in detail here. Instead, we have focused on the concept of a chemical paradigm of arrhythmogenesis. Many endogenous chemical substances (derived from the myocardium, nerves, blood plasma, platelets, leucocytes, and endothelium) accumulate in the ischaemic tissue or are produced during reperfusion and many of these have been suggested to modulate ventricular arrhythmias. Some substances may be arrhythmogenic and others may be antiarrhythmic. Together they determine whether or not arrhythmias occur. Potentially arrhythmogenic substances include potassium, catecholamines, cAMP, histamine, 5-HT, lysophosphatidylcholine, palmitylcarnitine, platelet activating factor, prostaglandins, leukotrienes, thromboxane A2, angiotensin II, endothelin, opioids, protons, calcium, and free radicals. We have considered each of these, with the objective of evaluating which are important in arrhythmogenesis in acute ischaemia and reperfusion. Two alternative models of arrhythmogenesis are possible in the context of the chemical paradigm: a series model (where one substance or its effects determines the arrhythmogenicity of another) and a parallel model (where numerous substances operate independently to cause ventricular arrhythmias). It is not yet clear which model is most appropriate; a combination of the two is possible, so a working prototype has been constructed which accommodates both. A set of criteria (hitherto lacking) for establishing whether a substance is sufficient and necessary for arrhythmogenesis is proposed. Some generalisations are given on approaches to establishment of these criteria for putative arrhythmogenic substances. Finally, we have considered how arrhythmogenic drug development may be influenced by using the chemical paradigm as an alternative to the electrophysiological paradigm of arrhythmogenesis.