Literature DB >> 8346327

Gender differences in sexuality: a meta-analysis.

M B Oliver1, J S Hyde.   

Abstract

This meta-analysis surveyed 177 usable sources that reported data on gender differences on 21 different measures of sexual attitudes and behaviors. The largest gender difference was in incidence of masturbation: Men had the greater incidence (d = .96). There was also a large gender difference in attitudes toward casual sex: Males had considerably more permissive attitudes (d = .81). There were no gender differences in attitudes toward homosexuality or in sexual satisfaction. Most other gender differences were in the small-to-moderate range. Gender differences narrowed from the 1960s to the 1980s for many variables. Chodorow's neoanalytic theory, sociobiology, social learning theory, social role theory, and script theory are discussed in relation to these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8346327     DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  66 in total

1.  Alcohol's effects on sexual perception.

Authors:  A Abbey; T Zawacki; P McAuslan
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2000-09

2.  Childhood sexual abuse moderates the association between sexual functioning and sexual distress in women.

Authors:  Kyle R Stephenson; Corey P Hughan; Cindy M Meston
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2012-03-03

3.  Sexual Communication, Sexual Goals, and Students' Transition to College: Implications for Sexual Assault, Decision-Making, and Risky Behaviors.

Authors:  Kristen P Lindgren; Rebecca L Schacht; David W Pantalone; Jessica A Blayney
Journal:  J Coll Stud Dev       Date:  2009-09

4.  Online communication predicts Belgian adolescents' initiation of romantic and sexual activity.

Authors:  Laura Vandenbosch; Ine Beyens; Laurens Vangeel; Steven Eggermont
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 5.  Puberty and adolescent sexuality.

Authors:  J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.587

6.  Gender/Racial Differences in Jock Identity, Dating, and Adolescent Sexual Risk.

Authors:  Kathleen E Miller; Michael P Farrell; Grace M Barnes; Merrill J Melnick; Don Sabo
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2005-04

7.  Condom use with a casual partner: what distinguishes college students' use when intoxicated?

Authors:  Antonia Abbey; Michele R Parkhill; Philip O Buck; Christopher Saenz
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2007-03

8.  Predictors and consequences of sexual "hookups" among college students: a short-term prospective study.

Authors:  Robyn L Fielder; Michael P Carey
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2009-01-09

9.  Health and demographic characteristics of respondents in an Australian national sexuality survey: comparison with population norms.

Authors:  D M Purdie; M P Dunne; F M Boyle; M D Cook; J M Najman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  THE SEXUAL DOUBLE STANDARD AND ADOLESCENT PEER ACCEPTANCE.

Authors:  Derek A Kreager; Jeremy Staff
Journal:  Soc Psychol Q       Date:  2009-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.