Literature DB >> 8346184

Application of flow cytometry in diagnosis of hydatidiform moles.

M Fukunaga1, S Ushigome, M Fukunaga1, M Sugishita.   

Abstract

We analyzed the nuclear DNA content of 219 hydropic placentas and 68 control (nonhydropic) placentas by flow cytometry (FCM) using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. Of 129 cases originally diagnosed as complete hydatidiform mole (CM), 91 were diploid, 25 tetraploid, one triploid, and 12 aneuploid. Of five invasive CM, two were diploid, and three (including one metastasizing mole) were tetraploid. Of 49 partial hydatidiform moles (PM), 36 were triploid and 13 were diploid. Of 41 hydropic abortuses (HA), 34 were diploid, one tetraploid, four triploid, and two aneuploid. Three control placentas were triploid, and the remaining 65 placentas were diploid. Based on FCM and review of the histology, 10 PM were reclassified as HA, and one PM was revised as CM. Four HA were reclassified as PM. One CM was revised as PM. These results show that the difficulty of histologic diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic diseases may lie in PM. Clinical follow-up information was available in 51 CM and 20 PM, and persistent trophoblastic disease followed 18% of CM and 0% of PM. Among diploid complete moles, DNA ploidy did not associate with persistent disease. A significant increase S-phase fraction (SPF) was detected in diploid CM when compared with HA and control placentas. However, among diploid CM, there was no significant difference of SPF between those with and without persistent disease. These findings suggest that DNA measurements by FCM may be an important aid in the diagnosis of hydropic placentas, but not a useful tool for predicting persistent disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8346184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  5 in total

1.  Genetic analysis of hydatidiform moles in paraffin wax embedded tissue using rapid, sequence specific PCR-based HLA class II typing.

Authors:  A C Bateman; S K Hemmatpour; J M Theaker; W M Howell
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Clinicopathologic profile of gestational trophoblastic disease.

Authors:  Darko Jelincic; Gernot Hudelist; Christian Fridolin Singer; Margit Bauer; Lars Christian Horn; Karin Bilek; Klaus Czerwenka
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Ki-67 expression in hydatidiform moles and hydropic abortions.

Authors:  Alireza Khooei; Fatemeh Atabaki Pasdar; Alireza Fazel; Mahmoud Mahmoudi; Mohammad Reza Nikravesh; Mohammad Khaje Delui; Bagher Pourheydar
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 0.611

4.  DNA flow cytometric analysis in variable types of hydropic placentas.

Authors:  Fatemeh Atabaki Pasdar; Alireza Khooei; Alireza Fazel; Maryam Rastin; Nafise Tabasi; Tahmineh Peirouvi; Mahmoud Mahmoudi
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2015-05

5.  Flow Cytometric DNA Analysis and Histopathologic Re-Evaluation of Paraffin Embedded Samples from Hydatidiform Moles and Hydropic Abortions.

Authors:  Narges Izadi-Mood; Soheila Sarmadi; Reza Tayebivaljozi; Farzaneh Mohammadi-Zia; Mohammad Farhadi
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-10-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.