Literature DB >> 8345554

Fetal growth: a comparison of growth curves with mathematical modeling.

L E Shields1, R W Huff, G M Jackson, D L Olive, R M Patterson.   

Abstract

This study compared the use of fetal growth curves with the Rossavik mathematical model in predicting third trimester fetal growth in 27 Hispanic patients. The parameters tested were BPD, HC, AC, and FL. The growth curve method of predicting third trimester fetal growth was significantly more accurate than the mathematical model for three of the four fetal parameters tested: BPD, HC, and FL. We conclude that the mathematical model method offered no advantage over the more commonly used growth curve method for predicting third trimester fetal growth. In addition, growth curves do not require complex calculations and are conceptually simpler and easier to use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8345554     DOI: 10.7863/jum.1993.12.5.271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  3 in total

1.  Personalized third-trimester fetal growth evaluation: comparisons of individualized growth assessment, percentile line and conditional probability methods.

Authors:  Russell L Deter; Wesley Lee; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Adi L Tarca; Jia Li; Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2015-09-25

Review 2.  Defining normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challenges.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Mario Merialdi; Lawrence D Platt; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Growth assessment in diagnosis of Fetal Growth Restriction. Review.

Authors:  A R Albu; I A Horhoianu; M C Dumitrascu; V Horhoianu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2014-06-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.