| Literature DB >> 8345077 |
M Bertrand-Servais1, H Letur-Könirsch, A Raoul-Duval, R Frydman.
Abstract
This study involved 50 patients interviewed in conversations with a psychologist. It was found that it was possible to characterize the kind of couples using assisted reproductive techniques in terms of diagnostic and psychological profile. Other observations included the repercussions of this action on the couples' stability in case of failure or success, the desire for children and the plans concerning them, the secrecy theme and questions arising from the practice of anonymous or non-anonymous oocyte donation. The relationship between recipients and donors, as well as the specific relationship between couples and their consultants, were also examined. It is concluded that the problems encountered differ according to the infertility diagnosis. Donor anonymity allows oocyte recipients to impose their own identity patterns onto the future child and to introduce him/her in an unbiased way to their own lives. Artificial techniques to assist in the conception of a child do not appear to interfere with the couple's relationship and their desire for a child, which remains constant for each member of the couple.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1993 PMID: 8345077 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138158
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Reprod ISSN: 0268-1161 Impact factor: 6.918