Literature DB >> 8345067

Ovarian stimulation with buserelin/HMG/HCG: prospective randomized study of short versus long protocol.

B C Tarlatzis1, G Pados, J Bontis, S Lagos, G Grimbizis, E Spanos, S Mantalenakis.   

Abstract

The combined administration of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist buserelin and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) was evaluated in 527 cycles (428 patients) of an assisted reproduction programme. All women were randomly allocated according to the ovulation induction protocol into two groups: group I (short protocol; 318 cycles) was given buserelin (1 mg/day) intranasally from cycle day 1 and HMG (2 ampoules/day) from day 3 until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration: group II (long protocol; 209 cycles) was given buserelin (1 mg/day) intranasally from cycle day 1 for at least 14 days and then 2 ampoules HMG/day were added, increasing progressively according to the ovarian response. The number (mean +/- SEM) of follicles developed was higher in group II than in group I (9.1 +/- 0.4 versus 7.7 +/- 0.3, respectively; P < 0.05). More oocytes were retrieved in group II (8.4 +/- 0.5) than in group I (6.5 +/- 0.3) (P < 0.001), as well as more embryos (6.3 +/- 0.5 and 4.0 +/- 0.3, respectively; P < 0.001). Moreover, in group II there was a better correlation between oestradiol and the total follicular volume (r = 0.5391) on cycle day 0 compared with group I (r = 0.458), while oestradiol values were similar between the two groups. No differences were observed in the cancellation rate, fertilization rate and maturity of the oocytes between the two groups. The pregnancy rate per transfer was slightly better in group II (25.8%) than in group I (19.4%), but this difference was not significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8345067     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  5 in total

1.  Different sperm sources and parameters can influence intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes before embryo implantation.

Authors:  Yue-hong Lu; Hui-juan Gao; Bai-jia Li; Ying-ming Zheng; Ying-hui Ye; Yu-li Qian; Chen-ming Xu; He-feng Huang; Fan Jin
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Induction of ovulation and systemic sclerosis: a case for surrogacy.

Authors:  M Tsirigotis; D Lammiman; I L Craft
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  The effects of sperm quality on embryo development after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Kalliopi E Loutradi; Basil C Tarlatzis; Dimitrios G Goulis; Leonidas Zepiridis; Thoula Pagou; Elisabeth Chatziioannou; Grigoris F Grimbizis; Ioannis Papadimas; Ioannis Bontis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Cytokines in the human ovary: presence in follicular fluid and correlation with leukotriene B4.

Authors:  H Bili; B C Tarlatzis; M Daniilidis; A Fleva; J Bontis; A Tourkantonis; S Mantalenakis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Evaluation of two gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues (leuprolide and buserelin) in short and long protocols for assisted reproduction techniques.

Authors:  B C Tarlatzis; G Grimbizis; F Pournaropoulos; J Bontis; S Lagos; G Pados; S Mantalenakis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.412

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.