Literature DB >> 8343145

Chromosome bands--flavours to savour.

J M Craig1, W A Bickmore.   

Abstract

The mammalian chromosome is longitudinally heterogeneous in structure and function and this is the basis for the specific banding patterns produced by various chromosome staining techniques. The two most frequently used techniques are G, or Giemsa banding and R, or reverse banding. Each type of stained band is characterised by variations in gene density, time of replication, base composition, density of repeat sequences, and chromatin packaging. It is increasingly apparent that R and G bands, which are complementary to each other, represent separate compartments of the euchromatic human genome, with R bands containing the vast majority of genes. R bands are also more GC-rich, contain a higher density of Alu repeats, and replicate earlier in S phase, than G bands. These properties may be interdependent and may have coevolved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8343145     DOI: 10.1002/bies.950150510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  46 in total

Review 1.  Higher levels of organization in the interphase nucleus of cycling and differentiated cells.

Authors:  A R Leitch
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  In silico chromosome staining: reconstruction of Giemsa bands from the whole human genome sequence.

Authors:  Yoshihito Niimura; Takashi Gojobori
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Chromosomal G-dark bands determine the spatial organization of centromeric heterochromatin in the nucleus.

Authors:  C Carvalho; H M Pereira; J Ferreira; C Pina; D Mendonça; A C Rosa; M Carmo-Fonseca
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.138

4.  Comparative maps of human 19p13.3 and mouse chromosome 10 allow identification of sequences at evolutionary breakpoints.

Authors:  R Puttagunta; L A Gordon; G E Meyer; D Kapfhamer; J E Lamerdin; P Kantheti; K M Portman; W K Chung; D E Jenne; A S Olsen; M Burmeister
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  A comparative analysis of transcribed genes in the mouse hypothalamus and neocortex reveals chromosomal clustering.

Authors:  Wee-Ming Boon; Tim Beissbarth; Lavinia Hyde; Gordon Smyth; Jenny Gunnersen; Derek A Denton; Hamish Scott; Seong-Seng Tan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A new platform linking chromosomal and sequence information.

Authors:  Agata Kowalska; Eva Bozsaky; Thomas Ramsauer; Dietmar Rieder; Gabriela Bindea; Thomas Lörch; Zlatko Trajanoski; Peter F Ambros
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  High-resolution analysis of DNA replication domain organization across an R/G-band boundary.

Authors:  S Strehl; J M LaSalle; M Lalande
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 8.  The temporal program of DNA replication: new insights into old questions.

Authors:  Daniele Zink
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  H3K27me3 forms BLOCs over silent genes and intergenic regions and specifies a histone banding pattern on a mouse autosomal chromosome.

Authors:  Florian M Pauler; Mathew A Sloane; Ru Huang; Kakkad Regha; Martha V Koerner; Ido Tamir; Andreas Sommer; Andras Aszodi; Thomas Jenuwein; Denise P Barlow
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Domain-wide regulation of DNA replication timing during mammalian development.

Authors:  Benjamin D Pope; Ichiro Hiratani; David M Gilbert
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.