S J Barker1, J Hyatt, N K Shah, Y J Kao. 1. University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Orange 92613-1491.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that pulse oximeters whose sensors are positioned improperly may yield erroneously low saturation (SpO2) values on normoxemic subjects. The behavior of oximeters with malpositioned sensors during hypoxemia has not been studied. The current study is aimed at determining the behavior of several different pulse oximeters over a wide range of arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2). METHODS: In each of 12 healthy volunteers, a radial artery cannula was inserted, and eight different pulse oximeters, five of which had malpositioned sensors, were applied. Subjects breathed controlled mixtures of nitrogen and oxygen to slowly vary their SaO2 from 100% to 70%. Arterial blood samples were analyzed and pulse oximeter data were recorded at five stable SaO2 values for each subject. RESULTS: The oximeters with malpositioned sensors vary greatly in their behavior, depending on both the actual SaO2 and the manufacturer and model. One oximeter underestimated saturation at all SaO2 values, while three others underestimated at high SaO2 and overestimated at low SaO2. Linear regression analysis shows a decrease in the slope of SpO2 versus SaO2 in most cases, indicating a loss of sensitivity to SaO2 changes. Between-subject variation in response curves was significant. CONCLUSIONS: The calibration curves of the pulse oximeters studied were changed greatly by sensor malpositioning. At low SaO2 values, these changes could cause the oximeter to indicate that a patient was only mildly hypoxemic when, in fact, hypoxemia was profound. It is recommended that sensor position be checked frequently and that inaccessible sensor locations be avoided whenever possible.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that pulse oximeters whose sensors are positioned improperly may yield erroneously low saturation (SpO2) values on normoxemic subjects. The behavior of oximeters with malpositioned sensors during hypoxemia has not been studied. The current study is aimed at determining the behavior of several different pulse oximeters over a wide range of arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2). METHODS: In each of 12 healthy volunteers, a radial artery cannula was inserted, and eight different pulse oximeters, five of which had malpositioned sensors, were applied. Subjects breathed controlled mixtures of nitrogen and oxygen to slowly vary their SaO2 from 100% to 70%. Arterial blood samples were analyzed and pulse oximeter data were recorded at five stable SaO2 values for each subject. RESULTS: The oximeters with malpositioned sensors vary greatly in their behavior, depending on both the actual SaO2 and the manufacturer and model. One oximeter underestimated saturation at all SaO2 values, while three others underestimated at high SaO2 and overestimated at low SaO2. Linear regression analysis shows a decrease in the slope of SpO2 versus SaO2 in most cases, indicating a loss of sensitivity to SaO2 changes. Between-subject variation in response curves was significant. CONCLUSIONS: The calibration curves of the pulse oximeters studied were changed greatly by sensor malpositioning. At low SaO2 values, these changes could cause the oximeter to indicate that a patient was only mildly hypoxemic when, in fact, hypoxemia was profound. It is recommended that sensor position be checked frequently and that inaccessible sensor locations be avoided whenever possible.