Literature DB >> 834226

The discovery of drug-induced illness.

H Jick.   

Abstract

The increased use of drugs (and the concurrent increased risks of drug-induced illness) require definition of relevant research areas and strategy. For established marketed drugs, research needs depend on the magnitudes of risk of an illness from a drug and the base-line risk. With the drug risk high and the base-line risk low, the problem surfaces in premarketing studies or through the epidemic that develops after marketing. If the drug adds slightly to a high base-line risk, the effect is undetectable. When both risks are low, adverse effects can be discovered by chance, but systematic case-referent studies can speed discovery. If both risks are high, clinical trials and nonexperimental studies may be used. With both risks intermediate, systematic evaluations, especially case-referent studies are needed. Newly marketed drugs should be routinely evaluated through compulsory registration and follow-up study of the earliest users.

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 834226     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197703032960904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  24 in total

1.  Automated surveillance for adverse drug events at a community hospital and an academic medical center.

Authors:  Peter M Kilbridge; Udobi C Campbell; Heidi B Cozart; Maryam G Mojarrad
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Balancing benefits and harms in health care: observational data on harm should complement systematic reviews of benefit.

Authors:  Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-27

3.  Adverse effects of observational studies when examining adverse outcomes of drugs: case-control studies with low prevalence of exposure.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Muhammad Mamdani; Ivan J Williams
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Benefits and harms of drug treatments.

Authors:  Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-03

5.  The influence of big pharma.

Authors:  R E Ferner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-16

Review 6.  Clarification of terminology in drug safety.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Aronson; Robin E Ferner
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies.

Authors:  Panagiotis N Papanikolaou; Georgia D Christidi; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Evaluating short-term drug effects using a physician-specific prescribing preference as an instrumental variable.

Authors:  M Alan Brookhart; Philip S Wang; Daniel H Solomon; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Thoughts on signal detection in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Learning how to control biases in studies to identify adverse effects of drugs: a brief personal history.

Authors:  Hershel Jick
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.