Literature DB >> 8341866

Calculation of power and sample size with bounded outcome scores.

E Lesaffre1, I Scheys, J Fröhlich, E Bluhmki.   

Abstract

The two-sample Wilcoxon rank sum test is the most popular non-parametric test for the comparison of two samples when the underlying distributions are not normal. Although the underlying distributions need not be known in detail to calculate the null distribution of the test statistic, parametric assumptions are often made to determine the power of the test or the sample size. We encountered difficulties with this approach in the planning of a recent clinical trial in stroke patients. It is shown that, for power and sample size estimation, it can be dangerous to apply the classical formulae routinely, especially with outcome scores having a U-shaped or a J-shaped distribution. As an example we have taken the Barthel index, a quality-of-life outcome measure in stroke patients. Further, we have investigated alternative methods by means of Monte Carlo simulation. The distributional characteristics of the estimated powers were compared. Our findings suggest more appropriate computer software is necessary for the calculation of power and sample size when efficacy is measured by a non-parametric method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8341866     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780121106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  5 in total

1.  Exemplary data set sample size calculation for Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests.

Authors:  George Divine; Alissa Kapke; Suzanne Havstad; Christine L M Joseph
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Effects of isokinetic strength training on walking in persons with stroke: a double-blind controlled pilot study.

Authors:  C M Kim; J J Eng; D L MacIntyre; A S Dawson
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.136

3.  Addressing the challenge of defining valid proteomic biomarkers and classifiers.

Authors:  Mohammed Dakna; Keith Harris; Alexandros Kalousis; Sebastien Carpentier; Walter Kolch; Joost P Schanstra; Marion Haubitz; Antonia Vlahou; Harald Mischak; Mark Girolami
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Sample size and power estimation for studies with health related quality of life outcomes: a comparison of four methods using the SF-36.

Authors:  Stephen J Walters
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2004-05-25       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Optimal sample size planning for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.

Authors:  Martin Happ; Arne C Bathke; Edgar Brunner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 2.373

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.