Literature DB >> 8341810

Re-evaluation of the reference dose for methylmercury and assessment of current exposure levels.

A H Stern1.   

Abstract

Methylmercury (Me-Hg) is widely distributed through freshwater and saltwater food chains and human consumption of fish and shellfish has lead to widespread exposure. Both the U.S. EPA Reference Dose (0.3 micrograms/kg/day) and the FAO/WHO Permissible Tolerable Weekly Intake (3.3 micrograms/kg/week) are currently based on the prevention of paraesthesia in adult and older children. However, Me-Hg exposure in utero is known to result in a range of developmental neurologic effects including clinical CNS symptoms and delayed onset of walking. Based on a critical review of developmental toxicity data from human and animal studies, it is concluded that current guidelines for the prevention of paraesthesia are not adequate to address developmental effects. A dose of 0.07 micrograms/kg/day is suggested as the best estimate of a potential reference dose for developmental effects. Data on nationwide fish consumption rates and Me-Hg levels in fish/seafood weighted by proportion of the catch intended for human consumption are analyzed in a Monte Carlo simulation to derive a probability distribution of background Me-Hg exposure. While various uncertainties in the toxicologic and exposure data limit the precision with which health risk can be estimated, this analysis suggests that at current levels of Me-Hg exposure, a significant fraction of women of childbearing age have exposures above this suggested reference dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8341810     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01087.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  10 in total

1.  Mercurial exposure of residents of Santarém and Oriximiná cities (Pará, Brazil) through fish consumption.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Bourdineaud; Gilles Durrieu; Sandra Layse Ferreira Sarrazin; Wânia Cristina Rodrigues da Silva; Rosa Helena Veras Mourão; Ricardo Bezerra de Oliveira
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Lessons for neurotoxicology from selected model compounds: SGOMSEC joint report.

Authors:  D C Rice; A M Evangelista de Duffard; R Duffard; A Iregren; H Satoh; C Watanabe
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Biological monitoring for mercury within a community with soil and fish contamination.

Authors:  M Harnly; S Seidel; P Rojas; R Fornes; P Flessel; D Smith; R Kreutzer; L Goldman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Role of self-caught fish in total fish consumption rates for recreational fishermen: Average consumption for some species exceeds allowable intake.

Authors:  Joanna Burger
Journal:  J Risk Res       Date:  2013

5.  Fishing, fish consumption, and awareness about warnings in a university community in central New Jersey in 2007, and comparisons with 2004.

Authors:  Joanna Burger
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 6.  The influence of nutrition on methyl mercury intoxication.

Authors:  L Chapman; H M Chan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Mercury in commercial fish: optimizing individual choices to reduce risk.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Alan H Stern; Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Neurotoxicity of lead, methylmercury, and PCBs in relation to the Great Lakes.

Authors:  D C Rice
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Immunotoxicity of heavy metals in relation to Great Lakes.

Authors:  J Bernier; P Brousseau; K Krzystyniak; H Tryphonas; M Fournier
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Neurobehavioral effects of developmental methylmercury exposure.

Authors:  S G Gilbert; K S Grant-Webster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.