Literature DB >> 8341334

Prenatal determination of fetal RhD type by DNA amplification.

P R Bennett1, C Le Van Kim, Y Colin, R M Warwick, B Chérif-Zahar, N M Fisk, J P Cartron.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An RhD-negative woman whose partner is heterozygous may have preexisting anti-RhD antibodies that may or may not affect a subsequent fetus, depending on whether it is heterozygous. A safe method of determining fetal RhD type early in pregnancy would eliminate the risks to an RhD-negative fetus of fetal-blood sampling or serial amniocenteses.
METHODS: We determined the RhD type in 15 fetuses using the polymerase chain reaction in amniotic cells and serologic methods in fetal blood collected simultaneously. In another 15 fetuses, the RhD type determined from chorionic-villus samples was compared with that identified by typing of DNA from the fetus itself.
RESULTS: RhD typing of DNA from amniotic cells correctly indicated the serologic type in every fetus. Of 10 fetuses with RhD-negative mothers, 4 were identified as RhD-negative and 6 as RhD-positive. Of five fetuses with RhD-positive mothers, four were identified as RhD-positive and one as RhD-negative. There was also complete agreement between the results of RhD typing of DNA from chorionic-villus samples and the results of typing of DNA from fetal tissue. Eleven fetuses were RhD-positive, and 4 were RhD-negative. Four RhD-positive fetuses had RhD-negative mothers. Three RhD-negative fetuses had RhD-positive mothers. There was no contamination by maternal RhD-positive DNA of the samples from RhD-negative fetuses.
CONCLUSIONS: Determining fetal RhD type in amniotic cells without invading the fetomaternal circulation is a reliable method that will be valuable in the management of Rh alloimmunization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8341334     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199308263290903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  19 in total

Review 1.  From prenatal genomic diagnosis to fetal personalized medicine: progress and challenges.

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  Haemolytic disease of the newborn.

Authors:  Neil A Murray; Irene A G Roberts
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  RHD PCR of D-Negative Blood Donors.

Authors:  Franz F Wagner
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.747

4.  Recommendations for the prevention and treatment of haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn.

Authors:  Francesco Bennardello; Serelina Coluzzi; Giuseppe Curciarello; Tullia Todros; Stefania Villa
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.443

5.  ABO genotyping: the quest for clinical applications.

Authors:  Willy A Flegel
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.443

6.  The RHD gene is highly detectable in RhD-negative Japanese donors.

Authors:  H Okuda; M Kawano; S Iwamoto; M Tanaka; T Seno; Y Okubo; E Kajii
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1997-07-15       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Present situation of the analysis of Rh genes.

Authors:  S Ikemoto; F Umenishi; S Iwamoto; S Tsuchida; T Oyamada; E Kajii
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1995-07-15       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  Molecular definition of red cell Rh haplotypes by tightly linked SphI RFLPs.

Authors:  C H Huang; M E Reid; Y Chen; G Coghlan; Y Okubo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  The two-gene model of the RH blood-group locus.

Authors:  J P Cartron; C Le Van Kim; B Cherif-Zahar; I Mouro; C Rouillac; Y Colin
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 3.857

10.  Molecular basis and PCR-DNA typing of the Fya/fyb blood group polymorphism.

Authors:  C Tournamille; C Le Van Kim; P Gane; J P Cartron; Y Colin
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.