Literature DB >> 8340698

The right to participate in research studies.

M L Elks1.   

Abstract

Institutional review boards for the use of human subjects in scientific studies were initially established to focus on protection of human subjects from the risks of research. It has become evident in recent years, however, that it is also important to protect the rights of individuals to have access to the benefits of research participation. These include, but are not limited to, certain experimental drugs or treatments, closer monitoring, free care or direct remuneration, and societal benefits of results of studies on specific populations. Researchers, so long sensitized by their respective institutional review boards to the need for protection of the subjects, now must also focus on the added burden of efforts to include individuals and the increased efforts it may take to protect the safety and rights of certain populations, including patients with AIDS, women, minorities, children, and the elderly. Additional care must be taken to design appropriate studies, recruit an appropriate spectrum of the population, craft a complete yet understandable and nondeterent informed consent form, and make efforts to assure that participants are informed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8340698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Lab Clin Med        ISSN: 0022-2143


  7 in total

1.  Decision-making and motivation to participate in biomedical research in southwest Nigeria.

Authors:  Pauline E Osamor; Nancy Kass
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.294

Review 2.  Women in clinical drug trials. An update.

Authors:  D L Schmucker; M S O'Mahony; E S Vesell
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Gender differences in pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  C H Gleiter; U Gundert-Remy
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.441

4.  Protecting people in research: a comparison between biomedical and traffic research.

Authors:  Sara Svensson; Sven Ove Hannson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  An institutional strategy to increase minority recruitment to therapeutic trials.

Authors:  Victoria V Anwuri; Lannis E Hall; Katherine Mathews; Brian C Springer; Jennifer R Tappenden; Dione M Farria; Sherrill Jackson; Melody S Goodman; Timothy J Eberlein; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  A Social Work Perspective on Paediatric and Adolescent Research Vulnerability.

Authors:  Kyle A McGregor; James A Hall; David A Wilkerson; Larry W Bennett; Mary A Ott
Journal:  Soc Work Soc Sci Rev       Date:  2016-04-13

7.  Culturally Competent Informed-Consent Process to Evaluate a Social Policy for Older Persons With Low Literacy: The Mexican Case.

Authors:  Emma Aguila; Beverly A Weidmer; Alfonso Rivera Illingworth; Homero Martinez
Journal:  Sage Open       Date:  2016-08-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.