Literature DB >> 8340177

A comparison of the passage of regenerating axons through old degenerated nerve autografts and fresh nerve autografts in rats.

H K Lee1, M S Chung, H J Kim.   

Abstract

We have compared the passage of regenerating axons through old degenerated nerve autografts and fresh nerve autografts in two groups of Sprague Dawley rats. In one group the right sciatic nerve was divided and repaired with the graft taken from the distal segment of the left sciatic nerve, which had been severed 15 weeks before. In the other group the right sciatic nerve was repaired with the graft taken from the intact left sciatic nerve. Eight weeks later the myelinated axons were counted at three different locations in the grafted right sciatic nerve in both groups. The old degenerated nerve autografts were less effective in allowing the passage of regenerating axons than the fresh nerve autografts, but the difference was not great. This provides justification for the use of old degenerated nerve as an additional graft where a large number of autogenous nerve grafts are required, such as in the operative treatment of injuries to the brachial plexus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8340177     DOI: 10.1007/bf00186385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  14 in total

1.  The nerve gap: suture under tension vs. graft.

Authors:  J Terzis; B Faibisoff; B Williams
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Experimental interfascicular nerve grafting.

Authors:  B R Bratton; D G Kline; W Coleman; A R Hudson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  The results of microneurosurgical reconstruction in complete brachial plexus palsy. Assessing outcome and predicting results.

Authors:  V R Hentz; A Narakas
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 4.  A review of experimental methods measuring peripheral nerve regeneration in animals.

Authors:  G K Frykman; P J McMillan; S Yegge
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Vascularized versus nonvascularized nerve grafts: an experimental structural comparison.

Authors:  B R Seckel; S E Ryan; J E Simons; R G Gagne; E Watkins
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Nerve grafting in peripheral nerve.

Authors:  L Marmor
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  The metabolic background for peripheral nerve surgery.

Authors:  T B Ducker; L G Kempe; G J Hayes
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Experience with the free vascularized ulnar nerve graft in repair of supraclavicular lesions of the brachial plexus.

Authors:  R Birch; M Dunkerton; G Bonney; A M Jamieson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Predegenerated nerve autografts as compared with fresh nerve autografts in freshly cut and precut motor nerve defects in the rat.

Authors:  L Gordon; H Buncke; D L Jewett; B Muldowney; G Buncke
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  The results of surgical repair of brachial plexus injuries.

Authors:  L Sedel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1982
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.