Literature DB >> 8339565

Tissue interaction with hydrogel sponges implanted in the rabbit cornea.

G J Crawford1, I J Constable, T V Chirila, S Vijayasekaran, D E Thompson.   

Abstract

We proposed poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) hydrogel sponges as potential materials for the peripheral zone of a composite keratoprosthesis. It was previously shown that such sponges allowed cellular invasion when implanted s.c. in rabbits. To evaluate the reaction elicited by these materials in the corneal tissue, a PHEMA sponge, with pore size diameters of 10-30 microns, was produced, impregnated with collagen, and implanted in the rabbit cornea in both central and limbal regions of separate eyes. The eyes were examined by slit-lamp biomicroscopy up to 6 months postoperatively. Enucleation was performed at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months, then excised implants were examined by light and transmission electron microscopy. Both clinical and histopathological examination indicated that sponges were well tolerated by the stromal and limbal tissues. No capsule was formed around any of the implants. Corneal fibroblasts and capillaries readily invaded the internal voids in the sponge to all depths. The invading cells remained viable and active up to the end of the follow-up period. Our findings suggest that hydrophilic PHEMA sponges may be successful as peripheral keratoprosthetic materials able to provide a permanent and tight fusion of the keratoprosthesis with the host tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8339565     DOI: 10.1097/00003226-199307000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  9 in total

1.  Novel materials to enhance keratoprosthesis integration.

Authors:  S R Sandeman; R G Faragher; M C Allen; C Liu; A W Lloyd
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Hydrophilic sponges based on 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate: part VII: modulation of sponge characteristics by changes in reactivity and hydrophilicity of crosslinking agents.

Authors:  X Lou; P D Dalton; T V Chirila
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Production of neocollagen by cells invading hydrogel sponges implanted in the rabbit cornea.

Authors:  T V Chirila; D E Thompson-Wallis; G J Crawford; I J Constable; S Vijayasekaran
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  The soft keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  D R Caldwell
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1997

5.  Liquid 2-poly-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate embolization of experimental arteriovenous malformations: feasibility study.

Authors:  Joachim Klisch; Lin Yin; Flavio Requejo; Barbara Eissner; Kai M Scheufler; Ralf Kubalek; Markus Buechner; Axel Pagenstecher; Heiner Nagursky; Martin Schumacher
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  AlphaCor artificial cornea: clinical outcome.

Authors:  N Jirásková; P Rozsival; M Burova; M Kalfertova
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Five year follow up of biocolonisable microporous fluorocarbon haptic (BIOKOP) keratoprosthesis implantation in patients with high risk of corneal graft failure.

Authors:  J L Alió; M E Mulet; H Haroun; J Merayo; J M Ruiz Moreno
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 8.  Keratoprostheses for corneal blindness: a review of contemporary devices.

Authors:  Venkata S Avadhanam; Helen E Smith; Christopher Liu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-16

Review 9.  Towards the use of hydrogels in the treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency.

Authors:  Bernice Wright; Shengli Mi; Che J Connon
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 7.851

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.