Literature DB >> 8338520

A study of the quality of impressions for anterior crowns received at a commercial laboratory.

P V Carrotte1, R B Winstanley, J R Green.   

Abstract

A report is presented of a study which was carried out to investigate the standard of impressions for anterior crowns received at a commercial dental laboratory in Great Britain. Aspects examined were the type of tray and its suitability to the impression technique used, fixation of the impression to the tray, the method of storage in transit, contamination, defects on the preparations and defects elsewhere affecting the occlusion. The quality of the actual preparation was not examined in this study. Similar details were noted for the opposing impression. Of the 50 cases examined only 12 were recorded as totally satisfactory, with 26 cases being recorded as not being of an acceptable standard for the construction of an adequate restoration. The results are presented with the conclusion that in this survey the general quality of impression was unacceptable.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8338520     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  5 in total

1.  Dental impressions: Metal rim lock trays.

Authors:  J S Hans
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Impression evaluation and laboratory use for single-unit crowns: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Michael S McCracken; Mark S Litaker; Ashley J George; Scott Durand; Sepideh Malekpour; Don G Marshall; Cyril Meyerowitz; Lauren Carter; Valeria V Gordan; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.634

3.  Laboratory Technician Assessment of the Quality of Single-Unit Crown Preparations and Impressions as Predictors of the Clinical Acceptability of Crowns as Determined by the Treating Dentist: Findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Michael S McCracken; Mark S Litaker; Alexandra E S Thomson; Alan Slootsky; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Communication methods and production techniques in fixed prosthesis fabrication: a UK based survey. Part 2: production techniques.

Authors:  J Berry; M Nesbit; S Saberi; H Petridis
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Quality of communication between dentists and dental laboratory technicians for fixed prosthodontics in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Huda Tulbah; Eman AlHamdan; Amal AlQahtani; Asma AlShahrani; Mona AlShaye
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2017-06-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.